Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (242608)	7/21/2005 11:08:07 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574478

re:disprove it with empirical evidence that contradicts that hypothesis It appears as though 10-20% is about the correct number according to these statistics. Assuming you use a pool of federal and appeals court judges. Nice find. Assuming that the current federal judges is an reasonable pool of eligible applicants, it would make sense to have one more woman appointed to the court........that would reflect the current gender ratio of the fed. judges.....of course that ratio is changing so quickly, adding a third woman in the next year or two would not be inappropriate. As far as the federal judges being the pool, remember that Roberts for one only has two years experience as a federal judge.