Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (693220)	7/21/2005 7:12:40 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Karen, what part of "Wilson contradicted himself" do you not understand? It's clearly documented his report said yes, and the next report, he changed his story. Would you be interested in proof?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (693220)	7/21/2005 8:44:09 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Respond to of 769670

You said: "Wilson correctly pointed to the flaws in Bush's yellowcake claim." Joe Wilson said in his report filed after returning from the job his wife got him he stated that there is evidence that Saddam sought Yellowcake Uranium. In his NYTimes Op/Ed he said there is no evidence that Saddam bought Yellowcake Uranium. This is called a switcheroo. He is lying by making accusation based on false evidence. Lies like that are why he has no credibility. Now compare this to the following statement: Wilson said Saddam sought uranium. Wilson said Saddam had not bought uranium. You would have a hard time hanging fifteen NYTime Op/Eds and 200 hours of liberally biased TV media on the second statement. Oh, the power of word choices. Perhaps you can point out where President Bush and his team said Saddam had bought Yellowcake uranium. I certainly don't recall it being a part of the preparations to liberate Iraq.