Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (242750)	7/22/2005 12:33:30 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574566

tejek, re:So your supposition that the ratio for any organization including the Supreme Court should overwhelmingly favor the men makes little sense. My assertion is it (the court, not any) currently reflects the pool of qualified candidates. The current pool is about 20% women. Also from your job numbers it appears 44% of the work force is women. So I believe the court will be in between those ranges. re:I can't believe we are even having this discussion Of course you can't - you're a self righteous liberal who knows everything. How will you conduct open discussions of ideas or an honest look at numbers without bringing all your biases and baggage. I said should, not an opinion but based on the assumption that government jobs will be consistent and reflect the current percentages. I also said it was the base or lowest number otherwise it would show a larger bias.