Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (175066)	7/23/2005 12:32:44 PM
From: Sr K	Respond to of 176387

They are required filings for elected officials, and others, with columns to enter an X for valuation ranges. The author just picked up the ones of $100,000 and over.

To: Elroy who wrote (175066)	7/23/2005 1:05:22 PM
From: William F. Wager, Jr.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Roberts' 2004 judicial financial disclosure, the most recent year available, shows he has a diverse financial portfolio, holding 40 individual stocks, several mutual fund accounts and bank accounts worth at least $2.8 million as of May 2004. The disclosures don't give a specific value for each investment but instead off bracketed ranges aimed at providing for approximate values. He also owns a house in suburban Maryland and has a 1/8th stake in a cottage in Knocklong, Limerick, Ireland. Robert's wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, works in Washington as an attorney representing corporate clients for Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. The income of spouses isn't disclosed on judicial financial forms. Federal judges and Supreme Court justices are allowed to continue holding investments, including individual stocks, once they take the bench. But these holdings - and the holdings and business activities of spouses and relatives - can lead to recusals on specific cases. In recent years, the Supreme Court has been able to rule on cases involving companies with few problems even as several justices continued to hold stock investments in their portfolios. Individual stock holdings can lead to a 4-4 split, or nonbinding decision, in a case. Supreme Court justices don't disclose why they recuse themselves from a specific case, but justices do occasionally sit out a case presumably because of their investments. Six sitting justices report assets in the millions, including Justices David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens and retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Justices O'Connor, Ginsburg and Breyer have all reported holding numerous individual stocks while other justices have limited or no individual stock investments. Should Roberts continue to hold stock investments once he joins the high court, he could face recusals on lawsuits involving telecommunications and high-technology companies.