Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (242898)	7/23/2005 3:25:14 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575130

re: You are the only raging over the top liberal here, as far as I can tell. That's only because you are a raging, over the top neocon. Its a matter of perspective. It's the same old trick, discredit the person with labels instead of the message. You get it in spades. Yup. ted

To: Road Walker who wrote (242898)	7/23/2005 11:56:22 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575130

It's the same old trick, discredit the person with labels instead of the message. You get it in spades. It's not a trick. He's earned the discredited position himself. His bias is more the driving force of his conclusions that whatever evidence is put before him. I can't give his posts any value because his partisan anti-Bush bias is so strong that it blocks out anything pro-Bush even where there are some things pro-Bush. How can you value anything he says when you know it is shaped with the desire to convince the reader that EVERYTHING about Bush is bad, EVERYTHING about the situation in Iraq is bad? For most on the thread that has views counter to mine on whatever issue I can read their posts and usually see thought process and what leads to their conclusion. With Ted, its been obvious for a long time now that his conclusion leads him to post various things, as opposed to the other way around.