Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (242981)	7/24/2005 7:57:45 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574569

He's very careful to not say that he or Muslims are plotting the overthrow of the Brit. gov't. He would like to see that happen but he doesn't suggest in any way that he is talking about the overthrow of the govt You really don't know your subject matter. This guy has been quoted as saying that Muslims will use Britain's freedoms against it in their war on Britain. He openly praises suicide bombing as a Muslim requirement of jihad. This guy is in open war with Britain and the West, yet we don't do anything about it. That to me is criminal negligence of the government in its duty to protect its citizens. As far as hate speech being treasonous, I guess it depends on whether it is directed at the government or not. But the hate speech I'm talking about is that type of speech directed against civilians. The gov't can take care of itself; civilians need the protection of the gov't, and that starts with legislation making the speakers of hate speech inciting others to do violence, as guilty as those who commit the violence. If a court finds that someone's hate speech could have reasonably lead to a murder of another civilian, then the speaker of that speech should go to jail as an accomplice and director of the action itself.