SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (127069)7/23/2005 8:10:47 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 793818
 
Wow, knowing as we do today, hitler was daily injected in his buttocks with all sorts of drugs, you think in sanity who the PM of England was would have made a difference. I would not call that a leap, I would call it the thwock at the end of a leap.



To: D. Long who wrote (127069)7/23/2005 8:18:16 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793818
 
If Churchill would have been PM instead of Chamberlain, I think Hitler would've been stopped at the Rhineland.

No doubt about it. Hitler would have had to scuttle out of the Rhineland, if he had gone in at all in the face of what would have been Churchill's very vocal opposition.

But that would not have been a preemptive situation. He would have been responding to Hitler's threat.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News