SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (243040)7/24/2005 4:54:57 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572719
 
So he deserved to die. Nice. Real nice. Thanks for your thoughts

Your crap conclusion illustrates my earlier point about your bias shaping your views. No one said "he deserved to die".

The average person sees his death exactly as Ten described it, a perfect storm of bad circumstances. You, it seems, for some strange twisted reason, see it as some result of George Bush's actions in the world.


I never said that that guy's death had anything to do with Bush.......I said it was an overreaction by the police. Its your bias towards me that saw an accusation of Bush when there was none. As for your conclusion that the average person sees it as a perfect storm of bad circumstances.........assuming that's true, and I am not sure it is, so what? I don't think of myself as average.

Besides, what perfect storm? What we think we know is that he was wearing a "padded" coat and was running from the police. That's a perfect storm? To come to the conclusion that its a perfect storm, one would have to know all the facts. I don't think either you or Ten have all the facts yet but you sure think you do.

Again its my opinion the police overreacted and on the surface, what facts we do have appear to confirm that view.

In any case, I am real tired of your rants. You are the worse kind of neocon.....coming from liberal roots as you do. Its enough.........so bye bye. Have a nice life, dude!