SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (36139)7/24/2005 3:57:17 PM
From: Lhn5Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<<no, it's not ridiculous. if you think it's ridiculous, that is proof that you have not studied past bubbles. they always revert to trend, and usually overshoot on the downside.>>

That is certainly true for paper assets, (and since you can't really eat tulips or sleep under one, I consider tulips a paper
asset) but not for hard assets like real estate.

<<so, it would not be surprising to see a much longer fall. also, if one considers that today's inflation rates are much lower than in the 1970s, then an increasing amount of price damage will have to be inflicted nominally rather than via inflation. that is a scary thought when you think about all the leverage out there today in RE.>>

There are all kinds of inflation. You I think are referring to consumer price inflation. There is also currency and asset inflation, both of which are going strong, and I think consumer price inflation is occurring at a rate significantly higher than the government statistics allow revealed.



To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (36139)7/24/2005 4:12:22 PM
From: John VosillaRespond to of 306849
 
"the scary thing is, the Nasdaq in 2000 and today's bubble RE markets are more overvalued than the Dow in 1966 by several measures such as standard deviations from trend (read Grantham and Schiller for detailed analyses)."

Good points and so true. In the long run any asset should be valued at a realistic multiple to the real cash flow it can generate.