SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (127356)7/24/2005 9:14:02 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793939
 
Let's remember, again, that it's the WH and not the CIA and not Wilson-Plame that are the focus of the investigation.

That's the fun part. We have no idea where Fitzgerald is going.



To: JohnM who wrote (127356)7/24/2005 10:57:59 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793939
 
Let's remember, again, that it's the WH and not the CIA and not Wilson-Plame that are the focus of the investigation.

How can we remember it when Fitzgerald has stated that Rove is not a target? In fact, I defy to produce anything but media speculation that says the WH is the focus. The media keep see-sawing between declaring a terrible crime (when the focus is on Rove or Libbey) and declaring that no crime was ever committed (when the focus is on Miller or Cooper). Fitzgerald has taken testimony from reporters, WH aides, and the CIA and has not declared his direction.



To: JohnM who wrote (127356)7/24/2005 11:42:43 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Respond to of 793939
 
Let's remember, again, that it's the WH and not the CIA and not Wilson-Plame that are the focus of the investigation.

And, what makes you so sure of that?

Investigations of criminal activity have twists and turns, as evidence and dislosures come to be known.

Do you have some sort of inside line to the Special Counsel?