Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (12565)	7/25/2005 5:09:58 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 35834

Well, it may be a little more than that, but you have a good point. It boggles the mind that folks would think that an undercover agent would be openly driving to CIA HQ almost every day for more than 5 years. And don't forget that Wilson's own book has her in Wash DC during that period with no mention of any travel overseas. Even one of her former supervisors reiterated those points & more. She also denied Plame was a covert agent at that time. And Plame had twins once she returned to DC. What are the odds of the CIA allowing her to continue covert ops after that? Think of the PR disaster if Plame was taken out in a covert operation & the public learned about the orphans. And what about the amicus brief filed by the MSM? And, and, and.... How do you make the grand leap to covert agent from that? Let's be real here. When you look at the available info out there, it looks highly unlikely Plame was or had been a covert agent in the 5 yrs leading up to Novak's article.