Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Supreme Court Nominations -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: calgal who wrote (167)	7/25/2005 8:33:41 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 292

This is a hotly debated topic. Why shouldn't we have term limits for Supreme Court justices? How many Rhenquist type scenarios must we have before we look at this issue. 18 Years Is Long Enough It's time for term limits for Supreme Court justices. Monday, July 25, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT John Roberts is only 50 years old. That means, should he be confirmed, he could be issuing opinions "when my granddaughter is in her 30s . . . and she was born just a year ago," noted liberal and Harvard University law professor Larry Tribe put it recently. ...contd at opinionjournal.com