Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (21730)	7/27/2005 12:20:01 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

"can a 9 month pregnant woman go to the abortion clinic and have the baby killed & taken out just because she wants to?" <<<YES! In Canada and the U.S.>>> "Can you give one such example of that happening?" Back to denying the obvious and then I suppose you will deny that you denied it. Partial birth abortion is a well documented fact. Are you saying partial birth abortions do not happen? I have yet to see anyone post a rational "medical necessity" for partial birth abortion. What it generally amounts to, is the desire to kill children with disabilities such as Down's Syndrome before they are legally protected and the parents are obligated to take care of them. Is this rare? Not as rare as it should be. I am against killing disabled children, are you? "Or are you going to argue that a fetus has to be carried to term by the slave-pod it grows in (i.e. woman), even if this endangers the life of the said woman?" Are you going to discuss my views or are you just interested in making stuff up and then attributing it to me? If the life of the mother is truly in jeopardy as it is in the case of an ectopic pregnancy then I think abortion can be morally justified. Is that plain enough for you? "Will you please stop pointing towards "Eternal Perspective Ministries" (???) as if they are some authority on the subject?" epm.org "Your insistence on quoting religious websites is doing nothing to further your argument." You demanded that I provide some sort of support for the position that Human Life begins at conception. That is why I posted it not bothering you with the link; epm.org But again; you have insisted that I post links to articles I quote; so now I should stop? The fact that it is a Christian web site does not change the truth or untruth of the arguments does it? I would prefer that you concentrate of the content and intellectual quality of the arguments themselves instead of simply making ad hominem challenges that are irrelevant.