Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (167187)	7/26/2005 11:50:19 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 281500

Honestly, I wouldn't want to assume responsibility in 2008 because I'd have to promise to "stay the course". On the other hand, 2012 should be easily winnable by promising to be out of Iraq by the end of the term.

To: Dennis O'Bell who wrote (167187)	7/26/2005 11:57:05 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Even I could vote for Hillary in 2008 depending on who she is running against, so why is 2008 automatic win for the republicans. I dont get it. By the way i have said that about Hillary on Lindy Bills thread. As for the court, dont go to crazy--congress and the exec are always up for grabs if the dems can run candidates that can win in the red states. If you tone down the anger at the bushies and attack them on matters of competence in iraq, you might just win. Some americans may have supported the war but are now questioning the way its been fault and whats the best course with today being DAY 1. Mike