SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (12132)7/26/2005 9:24:41 PM
From: Done, gone.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12810
 
Likely because 1) never owned a stock, 2) or if he/she did, likely it did not dole out dividends, and 3) if he/she did in fact ever buy a share of anything, it was likely a monster dog that lost huge, so no dividend income. As far as I can tell, the best AS can ever hope for is a tax loss.



To: tonto who wrote (12132)7/27/2005 4:15:41 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12810
 
That's actually good! It's stock related (in spirit of fair game here) -- even if from a political thread, thus bridging that gap which has been a source of contention here recently. Your nomination is seconded.

Errr ... where is it, .... that nomination. You were making one, yes?

"Today he wrote that stock dividends are not taxable...(it is a rich man's conspiracy."


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News