To: ChinuSFO who wrote (46 ) 7/26/2005 10:53:24 PM From: Win Smith Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 255 Not that I want to engage the "facts and logic" crowd, but: Q Given -- given recent developments in the CIA leak case, particularly Vice President Cheney's discussions with the investigators, do you still stand by what you said several months ago, a suggestion that it might be difficult to identify anybody who leaked the agent's name? THE PRESIDENT: That's up to -- Q And, and, do you stand by your pledge to fire anyone found to have done so? THE PRESIDENT: Yes. And that's up to the U.S. Attorney to find the facts. whitehouse.gov McClellan's record is much more entertaining, though. Q All right. Let me just follow up. You said this morning, "The President knows" that Karl Rove wasn't involved. How does he know that? MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I've made it very clear that it was a ridiculous suggestion in the first place. I saw some comments this morning from the person who made that suggestion, backing away from that. And I said it is simply not true. So, I mean, it's public knowledge. I've said that it's not true. And I have spoken with Karl Rove -- Q But how does -- MR. McCLELLAN: I'm not going to get into conversations that the President has with advisors or staff or anything of that nature; that's not my practice. Q But the President has a factual basis for knowing that Karl Rove -- MR. McCLELLAN: I said it publicly. I said that -- Q But I'm not asking what you said, I'm asking if the President has a factual basis for saying -- for your statement that he knows Karl Rove -- MR. McCLELLAN: He's aware of what I've said, that there is simply no truth to that suggestion. And I have spoken with Karl about it. whitehouse.gov My understanding is that the current line from the paragons of "personal responsibility" in the WH is that it's all a nefarious attempt to smear the noble Rove, who apparently has been given shelter in W's buck-free inner sanctum for the duration.