Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (167455)	7/27/2005 2:48:43 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"If we left Iraq, most the the insurgents cause would be gone. If civil war did break out, Iran would come in and help the Shia deal with the Sunnis with or without the Kurds help. Unfortunately, this is precisely what Bush does not want to see happen, so we are stuck in Iraq. IMO, the current Iraqi government will continue to cozy up with Iran diplomatically and more to the point, economically, so it is irrelevant anyway. We may as well leave sooner than later." That would be nice and I would egree with you except, what you seem to forget is that the Sunnis out number the Shias world wide. The Sunnis would be protected by the stakeholders around the world. So, it would not be as simple as you portray it. The insurgencies are all backed by external resources as well... gigantic blood bath, that would spill over to the rest of the planet.