My response to...
From: "iranian aryans" <iranianforaryans@hotmail.com> Add to To: ilatif@yahoo.com
CC: iranianforaryans@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: On your ''enough with the Hitler comparisons''
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:23:03 -0700
Greetings, and thanks for your speedy response.
I can see why you equate OBL-ism with "Hitlerism", in that both embody a fanatic, utopian weltanschauung. However, beyond the above, they are diametrically opposed ideologies. Your convoluted and high-falutin' verbiage notwithstanding, all forms of life have a wonder to them. Man is not the exceptional life-form.1
Your statement that a superior breed of Man must have "tusks" or "twice the size of brain" is ridiculing history. Superiority is an outward expression of the inner being. Nordics have shown their superiority in building all the wonderments that we are blessed with. I refer not only to scientific and technological achievements of Nordics but also to cultural creations. 2
On the other hand, blacks have done nothing. For example, can you think of one black civilization?3 History is proof positive of White achievement. Your dumbing-down of racial differences defies physical anthropology and empirical evidence.
As for equating the promotion of the ideas that races are unequal and therefore have different achievement abilities with "gas chambers" and the "Holocaust" (TM), you are doing nothing but smearing race-realists. Actually, the gas chambers were not used for gassings but for showering. The Allied/Communist line of Jewish soap, Jewish skin for lampshades, and gassing 6 million Jews is a lie:vide, "www.ihr.org".
As for suicide bombers, as much as I am against them, I can see reasons for their actions. They have guts.4 Indeed, which liberal diversity-monger is willing to die for his cause? What's happening in the Arab world is a situation of life and death. The Islamicists view it properly as just that. Hence, they take what actions they can against their enemies.
Regards,
iranian Aryans
Let me take your points in sequence..
1. Your point that ‘Man is not the exceptional life-form’ is really bizarre let me take you through the idea to create a partially man-made single-celled organism their scheme is to start with the simplest known self-reproducing organism, Mycoplasma genitalium. which is as simple as possible by major players are J. Craig Venter and Nobel laureate Hamilton O. Smith, famous for founding Celera Genomics Corp. that deciphered the human genome (see Genome Mania—Deciphering the human genome: what does it mean?), even this is still extremely complex, with 482 protein-coding genes, and a total of 580,000 ‘letters’in contrast for your infoe humans have 3 billion letters including an estimated 30,000 to 50,000 genes.
Mycoplasma’s immense complexity means we are far from really understanding how even this simplest life-form functions. So their next step is to try to understand, with the help of a powerful computer, ‘every conceivable aspect of the biology of one organism, a feat science has never come close to accomplishing’. From this, they will try to work out the bare minimum number of genes required for survival. Then they will generate DNA with the right sequence of ‘letters’ for this minimum complement of genes and inject it into a hollowed-out Mycoplasma.
They hope that this will result in a semi-artificial cell that will be able to feed and reproduce, and generate a population of new life forms.Note that they are still miles away from creating life—this is still very theoretical. In light of these self evident findings I hope we can agree that ‘Man is exceptional life-form.’
2. Referring to Nordics you could have easily referred to ‘Nordic man’ and the SS culture that you so proudly exhibit, SS culture proudly highlights Nordic man qualities in your mind; if this is the cultural supremacy you are proud of I am not going to concur with you. Following extract from SS culture is quite contemptible...
‘When Nordic man swears loyalty to another, he keeps it to the last breath. That we know, and we do it, too. We think about the great things, think about the loyalty we owe Fuehrer and folk.’
If above are the qualities of a Nordic man you refer too, I have very little to articulate, your allegiance to Fuehrer distinguishes no bounds and is definitely your obsession. I disagree with it but respect your views with a very heavy heart.
However, I don’t mix Nordic man like you with Fuehrer, I have lot of appreciation for the Nordics, the universal mission of the Scandinavian people cannot be underestimated, from the great migrations to the Norman invasion and discovery of America by a Nordic man Christopher Columbus, the descendant of the Lombards, it is the spirit of the Nordic people rising from the night like a phantom that has served as a beacon for mankind.
History reveal that all great races and people rise form ashes of violence and debauchery, may I refer to this quotation from history where these savages from North destroyed a whole empire and converted the empire into ten separate nations, albeit may be for good with benefit of hindsight but these great savages from North were hard-bitten plunderers. Wherever these savages went, they carried fire and slaughter, and whenever they departed, they left desolation and ruin in their track, and carried away multitudes of captives. Thus was the proud empire of Western Rome swept from the earth; and that which Constantine and his ecclesiastical flatterers had promised one another should be the everlasting salvation of the State, proved its speedy and everlasting ruin.
However Nordics were also savages like any other savages that mankind produced in its journey towards perfection, let me take you through their history, like Muslim plunderers of South Asia from the North of India in much later centuries, Vikings established for themselves a reputation as fierce pirates - their favourite targets were Christian churches and monasteries. It is unlikely that they targeted these places for any anti-Christian ideological reason, but rather for the fact that any wealth in any Christian territory was more than likely to have been drawn into the local church as a tax. The Vikings knew that the wealthiest place in any town would be the church, and always made straight for this building during any raid. Viking raiders always knew that the riches of society would be found hoarded in the church of any town. One of the most interesting stories from this time is that of the Viking raider Hasting, who plundered France for several years and then went to Italy with the intention of sacking Rome itself. Driven ashore by a storm near the town of Sarzana on the Magra River, the Viking mistook the town for Rome. Pretending to be on a peaceful mission, he was admitted into the town and baptized a Christian at the hands of the local bishop. During the following night, loud wailing was heard from the Viking ship, and it was announced that Hasting had died. He was taken ashore for a burial service - in the rich Christian church. It was an elaborate trick. As the Bishop was about to conduct the service for what he thought was his latest convert, Hasting sprang from the coffin, and, with the assistance of his armed followers, first dispatched the Bishop and the governor, and then attacked the town, capturing it after a bloody battle.
Definitely some enormous contributions of these savages in destroying Roam empire may be highlighted here.. They were definitely no less fierce than hordes of Mongols when they descended on the Roman Empire like Locusts invasion the devoured the richness and culture of the empire in no time although eventually from the ashes of this disaster a new culture emerged.
‘And onward those barbarians came, swiftly and in multitudes. For a hundred years the dark cloud had been hanging threateningly over the borders of the empire, encroaching slightly upon the West and breaking occasionally upon the East. But at the close of the fourth century the tempest burst in all its fury, and the flood was flowing ruinously. As early as A. D. 377 a million Goths had crossed the Danube, and between that time and A. D. 400 they had ravaged the country from Thessalonica to the Adriatic Sea. In A. D. 400 a host of them entered the borders of Italy, but were restrained for a season.
In 406 a band of Burgundians, Vandals, Suevi, and Alani from the north of Germany, four hundred thousand strong, overran the country as far as Florence. In the siege of that city their course was checked with the loss of more than one hundred thousand. They then returned to Germany, and with large accessions to their numbers, overran all the southern part of Gaul. The Burgundians remained in Gaul; the Vandals, the Alani, and the Suevi overran all the southern part of Spain, and carried their ravages over the greater part of that province, and clear to the Strait of Gibraltar.
In 410 again returned the mighty hosts of the Goths, and spread over all Italy from the Alps to the Strait of Sicily, and for five days inflicted upon Rome such pillage as had never befallen it since the day, nearly a thousand years before, when the Cimbri left it in ruins. They marched out of Italy and took possession of Southeastern Gaul from the Mediterranean Sea to the Bay of Biscay.
In May 429, the Vandals, in whose numbers of the Alani had been absorbed, crossed the Strait of Gibraltar into Africa, and for ten years ravaged the country from there to Carthage, of which city they took possession with great slaughter, October 9, A. D. 439; and in 440 the terrible Genseric, king of the Vandals, ruled the Mediterranean and sacked the city of Rome.
In 449 the Saxons and their German neighbors invaded Britain, of which they soon became sole possessors, utterly exterminating the native inhabitants.
In 451-3 another mighty host, numbering seven hundred thousand, of all the barbarous nations, led by Attila, desolated Eastern Gaul as far as Chalons, and the north of Italy as far as the Rhone, but returned again beyond the Danube.
And finally, in 476, when Odoacer, king of the Heruli, became king of Italy, the last vestige of the Western empire of Rome was gone, and was divided among the ten nations of barbarians of the North.
3. For example, can you think of one black civilization?
On a very lighter note Tiger Wood has in this modern day and age carried a cross of many a great failures of the black, one Nordic cannot match his prowess and abilities in ‘putting his ball through a hole,’ it must be quite painful for lot of Nordics. This must be in your sight a divine mistake of ‘black empowerment’ but it does tell me that millions of black who have done so well in lands of opportunity must be equally gifted like a Nordic man, in terms of biological evolution Nordic man may be superior in build but in mind under equal opportunity circumstances Condi Rice and Clarence Thomas have shown a lot of hope.
Some create equal opportunity through their swords like savages of the east others require benevolent legislation.
"What became of the Black People of Sumer?" the traveler asked the old man, "for ancient records show that the people of Sumer were Black. What happened to them?"
"Ah,"the old man sighed."They lost their history,so they died…."
Hence on a more relevant note.. Please kindly have some time to read this history book ‘The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race From 4500 B.C. To 2000 A.D.’ it is characterized by marked detail to the often ignored black African revered figures of antiquity, prosperous kingdoms, and economic, social and political structures that predetermined the development of Western economic, social and political structure. In these pages you will find unmatched and carefully crafted and documented scholarly historical discourse on the growth of black African states such as Ethiopia, great and powerful empires like Mali and Songhay, and venerable rulers, such as Queen Nzinga. Equal detail and attention are given to the discussion of the elements which led to the downfall of these black civilizations, and the literal erasing of the black African--in antiquity and the present--from the critical worldview stage.
4. <As for suicide bombers, as much as I am against them, I can see reasons for their actions. They have guts.>
I beg to differ on this, for me taking one owns life is cowardice of extreme nature a living example of self-pity and self-gratification, this is denial of basic human contract through which we have progressed as human beings so far. This whole concept of sacrifices is further complicated by banal nature of holy promises of carnal pleasures in the next world.
Most of these suicide bombers are religious zealots, for them to take out few infidels is a matter of religious importance and an act thoroughly rewarded by Allah. Liberals don’t have such fixations, for them human life has to be respected. Someone who encourages youngsters to strap bombs on themselves with the intent of killing innocent civilians has no self-esteem, the lesson being taught, “if we cannot live peacefully then we will not let others live peacefully.” That is not a prescription for a healthy society.
I believe that life is a gift of God and that progress and prosperity is a result of continuous hard work. Naturally prosperity, well-being, enhanced standards of living does make people comfortable and that makes love their near ones and surroundings they live in. To destroy this social structure established in the society on basis of ‘if I can’t have I will deny it to you too’ is unadulterated barbarism. Present prosperity of mankind is a result of a virtuous cycle, a success of a model of cooperation between human beings and their ability to play their hand right.
|
