SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1336)7/28/2005 8:59:45 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24225
 
Chevron Speaks Up on Energy Depletion
Major oil companies have traditionally dismissed and downplayed concerns about depletion of the world's recoverable supply of oil.

"Don't worry," I've heard them say. "The world has enough oil to meet demand for another 100 years."

It's a logical response, if you're a big public oil company.

If investors thought depletion was looming, as many experts contend, the value of oil stocks would decline. If that happens, the value of your company plummets and your borrowing power begins to tailspin.

But attitudes are changing. One major oil company has acknowledged the depletion issue and is warning consumers of a forthcoming energy crisis.

Chevron Corp. has launched a bold advertising campaign that clearly suggests the available supply of oil is near depletion and urges the world to find alternatives before it's too late.

Chevron's campaign to raise awareness and promote discussion of oil depletion and potential solutions is impressive. The advertising is eye-opening.

In one giant ad that appeared Tuesday in The Wall Street Journal, Chevron states: "It took us 125 years to use the first trillion barrels of oil. We'll use the next trillion in 30."

Whoa! What a frightening statement.

The end of oil is just 30 years away. How does an industrialized world function without oil? Unless a viable alternative is conceived, it doesn't. That's the point Chevron is trying to make.

In that same ad, Chevron Chairman David J. O'Reilly says the era of easy oil is over and that political, economic and physical barriers are preventing the exploitation of newfound supplies.

Some day the world will run out of oil. No one knows for sure when that day will come. But the fact that Chevron, the nation's second-largest oil company, is using this kind of language in a global campaign indicates that the day may come sooner rather than later.

If Chevron is right, the world will run out of oil within my lifetime and the lifetime of our children.

As O'Reilly puts it: "What we all do next will determine how well we meet the energy needs of the entire world in this century and beyond."

The best thing about Chevron's energy awareness campaign is that you can participate through an innovative Web site at www.willyoujoinus.com. You can read what others are saying about the world's energy problems as well as share your own energy ideas and solutions.

I scanned some of the discussions. The ideas were interesting.

Making ethanol from cellulose, or plant material, was discussed. The U.S. Senate thought that was a good idea, too, and included a provision subsidizing ethanol made from crop waste in the Senate- passed energy bill.

Other ideas center on greater fuel efficiency for automobiles and increased investments in mass transit.

Thank you, Chevron, for having a social conscience.

Controversy over ethanol: To help limit the use of gasoline and imported oil, the Senate energy bill would double the use of ethanol in gasoline to 8 billion gallons a year by 2012.

However, increasing the use of ethanol would be a waste of time, according to researchers at Cornell University and the University of California-Berkeley.

Their newly released study contends that the process used to convert corn into ethanol burns more energy than it produces -- about 29 percent more.

The American Farm Bureau Federation said the study was slanted and that the assumptions used to compile the report were most likely flawed.

Russell Ray 581-8380

russell.ray@tulsaworld.com

Source: Tulsa World

rednova.com