Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Freep who wrote (122445)	7/28/2005 4:22:13 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo	Respond to of 209892

Just got to the computer long enough to see your long message, and another from BC.......BOTH of which I'll want to comment on........but won't be able to get to until later this evening.....

To: The Freep who wrote (122445)	7/28/2005 9:42:32 PM
From: ajtj99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

I use inverse H&S as a term to describe formations that look like that. However, in the strict textbook interpretation of the pattern, I may not be using the term correctly. However, the result is the same, so who really cares? It's easier to say "inverse H&S" than "Bullish Consolidating Pattern" or "Cup and Handle" or "continuation head and shoulders pattern". You guys know what the heck I'm seeing and what I mean. When I mention them, I reckon about 90% of the time they follow through. I got the same crap for a very long time about the end of month Dow play. I post proof and it still seems like religion to many folks. I post a ton of charts, share my views, and that probably makes me an easy target for nit-picking over nomenclature. I really don't care in the end, as my account is what's important and not how someone views the opinions I share. I guess I should post this to mchjc, but you were just more eloquent in your response. As for SBUX, if I'd had more than 2-minutes to respond (I wanted to respond before the close) I would have noticed the symmetry in the daily chart of the 49.14 and 49.28 lows. The beginning and end of the visit to the $49 level in Feb. lasted a little under a month. Same with the recent drop to 50. I only noticed the price action to the right of the 49.28 July low and not the price action to the right of the 49.14 Feb. low. Symmetry, another term not understood or respected when applied to charts, but a damn fine way for me to see the way things are going in the future. stockcharts.com[e,a]daclyiay[d20041112,20051231][pc9!c13!c20!d20,2!c50!c200!b50!b200!f][vc60][iLa12,26,9!Lh5,5!Li10,10!Lp14,3,3!Ll14!Lo14!Lb14!Le5,10,1!Lh89,34!Lh45,17!Li180,68!Lp3,2,2!Lb5]&pref=G