SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (128272)7/29/2005 10:29:47 AM
From: Constant Reader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793908
 
Hasn't most of the growth in China actually come as a result of allowing decentralized decision-making by regional authorities?



To: neolib who wrote (128272)7/29/2005 10:52:18 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793908
 
The Chinese system is a dismal failure for the bulk of its citizens. But transitioning from a planned economy to a freer one is a non-trivial task. It's not as easy as throwing a switch. If what we are watching is the Chinese method to make the transition to a relatively free market system, I applaud their creativity and look forward to watching them reap the benefits as the transition proceeds. If this is as far as the elites are willing to take it, I'm with the crowd that expects to see a spectacular fizzle and social instability. I am rooting for them to succeed.



To: neolib who wrote (128272)7/29/2005 6:56:38 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793908
 
My point was that much of the success of China has been because they have moved away from the high level of central planning that they had. "Doomed to failure", esp. if it means "doomed to failure no matter what" rather then "doomed to failure if they don't change", is probably to much. But "at a large disadvantage if they don't change", isn't.

Tim