SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: energyplay who wrote (66720)7/30/2005 2:43:33 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello EP, taking your points one at a time, to develop my own ideas more fully, I expect:

<<Overcapacity : I expect a number of countries will throw up tariff and non-tariff barriers in an attempt to avoid having their local industries gutted>>

YES, certainly, but may not work well, because in an environment where not everyone does it at the same nasty time, the ones who do will do relatively and cumulatively less well than those who do not throw up barriers, i.e. US duties China autos but does not do same to Japan will encourage Japan to source from China in order to supply to US, and / or US duties China autos but Europe does not, will see Europe having a higher standard of living than US. Cumulatively, over time, the mass of math will begin to show its weight.

Should everyone crackdown on everyone else's trade, then all bets are off, with the USD being the first casualty (no trade, no need for dollars), and global financial chaos (globa money dies, causing darkness). In this event the larger countries will do relatively better than the smaller countries, and those that re-enages in global trade sooner will do better than those who re-engages later, before long, we are back to where we started, namely global equalization of cost and revenue, and so of living standard.


<<Japan should have an interesting response - they will take the China sourced parts, then try to keep their domestic suppliers alive. As for the plants they have set up in other Asian countries, will they abandon them or try to find a way to keep them on life support ?>>

It would be in Japan's interest to keep globalization going, because (a) their country is not large in the continental sense, nor self-sufficient, and (b) their invested sums only has value in the context of continuing global trade, else all is nought.

<<I expect we will see the resource countries - Canada, Austrailia, Chile, New Zealand and to soem degree South Africa and Brazil do well.>>

Almost certainly, as in whatever happens, and they all have an incentive to trade, because each is not continental, and has surplus of what others need.

The US unilaterally dropping out of the world trade system is not a viable / sustainable option, but that does not mean it will elect not to try it, for a while, based on the shimmering artifact notion that 'oh but we are self sufficient, and so can go back to the age of 1776'.

The TeoTwawKi train does not off load passengers until the destination stop. Slagle not withstanding.

Buy gold.


Chugs, J