SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (128577)7/30/2005 6:04:54 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793846
 

Why Truman Dropped the Bomb


That is what started this whole discussion, Tom. :>)

Message 21556854

lindybill@doesntgettheword.com



To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (128577)7/30/2005 6:21:07 PM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 793846
 
I doubt that these revisionists would have had the same view if they had been cued up for the invasion of Japan with the rest of our war-weary soldiers. I'm sure they would have cheered the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki just like everybody else who lived because of it.

Anybody who wants to revise the history of the Pacific War should read "Goodbye, Darkness" by William Manchester. He wrote of it from a nose to nose perspective that nobody, least of all latterday revisionists, can deny. He saw war at its worst, and survived because the invasion of Japan became unnecessary.

A friend and colleague is the son of a couple who survived Hiroshima by virtue of a small hill that shielded them from the blast. They became American citizens after the war.

The displacement of the so-called traditionalist view within important segments of American opinion took several decades to accomplish. It will take a similar span of time to displace the critical orthodoxy that arose in the 1960s and prevailed roughly through the 1980s, and replace it with a richer appreciation for the realities of 1945. But the clock is ticking.