Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (22069)	7/31/2005 10:38:14 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

I'm not sure how reading what people say, and thinking they mean something by what they say (something that is a societally agreed upon way of taking a word), is fundamentalist, or even judgmental (except about the word "partner"- and if we make no judgments about what words mean, how do we decide among various meanings?). Would you care to explain that? I can understand how the reaction to the interpretation might be fundamentalist, but I can't see how just thinking the word means what we know we define the word to mean is fundamentalist. Looking forward to your explanation.