Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (38763)	7/31/2005 4:36:08 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Thud! (s) I have yet to read impeachable information, but otherwise I agree with you...if they can come up with more evidence, you may get your wish. Although I rarely agree with you tonto, Kerry did support the Iraq war, and STILL supports it. But the chimp is the one who ginned up the phony intel to launch it, and planned for it from his first day in office. That's why he should be impeached.

To: bentway who wrote (38763)	7/31/2005 5:43:16 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Kerry supports the troops in Iraq and disarming Saddam. He did not support the way Bush went to war. Not at all. If Kerry had been in charge everything would have been done differently, much more responsibly,with much more coalition building and preparation, much better planned. Also, the job against Al Qaida would have been finished first. In fact JK might have been able to avoid the whole mess and still get rid of Saddam. But no, he never supported Bush's rush to war. He made that very clear before his vote and after his vote. The correct vote was neither yes nor no, it was a conditional yes or conditional no. Kerry could have not voted but he really did want to send a strong signal to Saddam to open up the country for thorough inspections. Up until the time Bush rushed into Iraq, that was working. Onh this point both liberals and rightwingers are wrong. The right vote was inbetween. "Go to war only if --- as a last resort because we have to, not because we want to". That's was clearly JK's position from the beginning until the end. Never changed it. Never flip-flopped. And he was right.

To: bentway who wrote (38763)	7/31/2005 6:14:45 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 93284

Here is what Kerry said before the war on Iraq. independentsforkerry.org States very clearly that if Bush doesn't go all the way with the diplomacy and builds a strong coalition that he will be among the first to speak out. Some call that sitting on the fence, I call it holding Bush's feet to the fire. The only thing wrong about invading Iraq was how Bush did it, with piss poor preparation, almost unilaterally without finishing the inspections and finding proof of WMD's.