SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (128879)7/31/2005 7:45:52 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793964
 
IF Bush were so "opposed" to embryonic stem-cell research, he would never have proposed ANY of that type of research and suggest that the Government pay for it.

He didn't propose any such thing. He acceded to it. Do you recall how he agonized over that and how he reluctantly conceded the research on existing lines of embryonic stem cells? Did you notice that he has signaled that he will veto the pending bill? Sounds like a guy who disapproves of embryonic stem cell research to me.

No matter, though. I was just wondering if you had seen anything where he endorsed the private research only because I would have been surprised.



To: KLP who wrote (128879)7/31/2005 10:03:17 PM
From: Bridge Player  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
Here is a link to the original address by President Bush when he announced the administration policy on stem cell research.

There doesn't seem to be anything in it in which he supported private funding of additional stem cell lines.

whitehouse.gov

Edit: I see that you made the same point in a later post.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News