Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (244561)	8/3/2005 1:57:27 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1576725

McElroy represents Philip Paulson, one of two atheists who filed the original lawsuit against the city in 1989. My Irish cousin!

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (244561)	8/3/2005 2:50:28 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1576725

re:Are you saying the veterans are atheists? Yeah - that's what I was saying - cute, most veterans are not anymore atheist than the population at large which poll after poll shows the majority express some belief in a god. It was two atheists from your link - McElroy represents Philip Paulson, one of two atheists who filed the original lawsuit against the city in 1989. They are atheists but they're not veterans. The veterans are moving the cross across the street onto private land. What is the big deal? Fundamentalists in San Diego are making trouble because they want to and not because there is not an equitable solution at hand. In violation of the courts and two years of history, they want it the way they want it. Since 1989 - that seems pretty zealous to me. <g> Only because it was determined by the conservative courts in San Diego that it was in violation of the separation of church and state. That decision has been appealed at least twice.