Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (244691)	8/3/2005 2:36:25 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572637

Elroy, re:No you're not getting it. The main issue is not the cost, it's whether or not its acceptable for a mother who doesn't want a fetus inside her to remove it (and kill it). Cost is totally a secondary issue compared to that. The ethical issues you raise don't apply to me because I already support abortion.

To: Elroy who wrote (244691)	8/3/2005 2:50:14 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572637

Elroy, The main issue is not the cost, it's whether or not its acceptable for a mother who doesn't want a fetus inside her to remove it (and kill it). I'm sure it's preferable to killing the baby, but you can't ignore the issue of cost. Having the mother carry the baby to term and giving it up for adoption is much easier for the state to support than having the baby removed from the mother's womb and grown in an incubator. Of course, the feminists will vehemently remind us that they don't want the state to force their bodies to become incubators. But don't you see what's being ignored in this whole debate? Tenchusatsu