SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (107139)8/4/2005 8:55:35 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Depends what you are doing- if you are applying pesticides you might have an elevated risk:

annieappleseedproject.org

annieappleseedproject.org

If you are just using machines and not coming in to contact with pesticides- then lower risk:

cancer.org



To: Ish who wrote (107139)8/5/2005 10:32:21 PM
From: Grainne  Respond to of 108807
 
This is an interesting article about the woes of Argentina and what happened there with GM soy. Very interesting about all those Roundup-resistant weeds and fungus!

Argentina’s GM Woes
Proponents claim that GM crops are necessary for fighting hunger in developing countries and decreasing the use of pesticides. The evidence shows otherwise. GM crops have exacerbated poverty and hunger, increased herbicides use, brought new health hazards, destroyed agricultural land and livelihoods, and resulted in deforestation. Report by Dr. Lilian Joensen in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Dr. Mae-Wan Ho in London, UK.

Within the past decade in Argentina, 160,000 families of small farmers have left the land, unable to compete with large farmers. GM soya has served to exacerbate this trend towards large-scale, industrial agriculture, accelerating poverty.

Roundup Ready (RR) soya clearly requires more, not less, herbicide than conventional soya. In 2001, more than 9.1 million kg of extra herbicide was used with GM soya compared with non-GM. The use of glyphosate doubled from 28 million litres in the period 1997/98 to 56 million litres in 1998/1999, and reached 100 millions in the last (2002) season.

RR soya crops also yield 5% to 10% less compared with the non-GM varieties grown under similar soil conditions, confirming findings in the United States. Scientists at the University of Arkansas showed that root development, nodule formation and nitrogen fixation worsened in some varieties of RR soya and the effects are exacerbated under strong drought conditions or in relatively infertile fields. That is because the symbiotic bacterium responsible for fixing nitrogen in soya, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, is very sensitive to drought and to Roundup.

Argentina started to transform its economy to an export-led focus on soya when it had to pay back foreign debt with money gained through export commodities. During the last quarter century, soybean production increased at an unprecedented rate from an area of 38 000 hectares in 1970 to approximately 13 million hectares today. Around 70% of the soybean harvested is converted in oil-processing plants, most of which is exported, providing 81% of the world’s exported soya oil and 36% of soybean meal.

Soya was identified as a buoyant market, and Monsanto’s offer of subsidized Roundup Ready Soya seed and heavily discounted glyphosate prices in 1996 proved irresistible to Argentinean farmers.

Practically all of 13 million hectares of soya crop are GM, in particular, RR soya. Bt cotton and Bt maize cover another million hectares between them. Monsanto is in the process of applying for a permit to grow RR maize.

Argentina is currently the second biggest producer of GM Soya in the World. The countryside has been transformed from traditional mixed and rotation farming, which secured soil fertility and minimized the use of pesticides, to almost entirely GM soya.

Financial problems for farmers are set to worsen with Monsanto now starting to charge royalties for their seeds, where before, it was allowing farm-saved seeds. Twenty-four million acres of land belonging to bankrupted small farmers are about to be auctioned by the banks.

With an increase in poverty, a glut in soya, and a deficit of other agricultural products, the government began to promote soya as a healthy alternative to traditional foodstuffs such as meat and milk. A campaign, Soja Solidaridad (Soya Solidarity) was launched. Soup kitchens served soya-based meals and cookbooks were written with soya-based recipes. As a result, many people are consuming soya-based foods on a daily basis.

There is a large body of scientific evidence showing that an unbalanced diet based on soya can have nutritionally damaging effects. Too much soya can inhibit absorption of calcium, iron, zinc and vitamin B12, and doctors in Argentina are already seeing such symptoms. Among the most worrying observation is the early onset of puberty in girls, possibly linked to the high levels of phytoestrogen in soya.

Other health problems have been caused by the widespread increased use of glyphosate (Roundup). Glyphosate is entering the water supply. There are reports of crop sprayings by plane, dousing people and their homes. The more visible symptoms of this spraying include skin and eye irritations and recent field research (personal communications by local people and medical doctors) suggests that there is a great increase in the incidence of cancer within populations surrounding RR soya fields.

Peasants in Santiago del Estero, North Argentina, who have been living there for generations, say that they are being threatened by big land-owners linked to seed companies and supported by local police and parapolice-like forces. To intimidate the peasants, they set fire to the forests while shooting around the people in order to take their land for planting RRsoya.

Studies carried out by the University of Formosa Province have reported serious health problems in peasant communities due to pesticide fumigation on surrounding RRsoya fields. Their crop and animal production, which families depend on to survive, have been completely destroyed. A judge has forbidden the use of pesticides on RRsoya, but companies have flouted the prohibition and kept on fumigating.

Roundup resistant weeds have appeared. A list of the resistant weeds published to-date include Commelia erecta, Convulvulus arvensis, Ipomoea purpurea, Iresine difusa, Hybanthus parviflorus, Parietaria debilis, Viola arvensis, Petunia axillaris, Verbena sp, Hybanthu sparviflorus, Tragopogon sp, Senecio pampeanus, Sonchu soleraceus, Sonchu sasper and Taraxa cumofficinale.

Highly toxic herbicides, some of them banned in other countries, which glyphosate was supposed to replace, have had to be brought back in use in addition to glyphosate. These include 2,4D, 2,4DB, Atrazine, Paraquat, Metsulphuron Methyl, Imazethapyr. There are also reports of a fungus, new in Argentina (Phakopsora sp.) which is spreading and requiring additional fungicide.

In order to fight the "insect complex" that invade soya plantations (Nezara viridula, Piezodorus guildinii, Edessa meditabunda, Dichelops furcatus) producers are recommended to use endosulphan together with cipermetrine, which together are labeled as extremely toxic for bees and fish and very toxic for birds. Prices for the insecticides, including air-fumigation are specified in the recommendations.

Argentina’s balance of agricultural products has been seriously affected by the focus on a soya-led export economy. Production of traditional Argentinean products such as milk, wheat and meat has gone down, and the country now imports where it used to export. Other produce, such as lentils, peas, sweet maize, as well as different potato and sweet potato varieties have disappeared together with the industries linked to their processing. Honey producers have been affected due to GM contamination, the loss of flora diversity, as well as well as death of bees by herbicide poisoning. These are not only bad for the country’s economy but also devastating for the health and nutrition of the entire population.

Soya plantations began in the Argentina Pampas, one of the six most agriculturally productive regions in the world. Its soils cover some 9 million hectares and used to be rich in nutrients and organic matter. The ‘no tillage` method was introduced 10 years ago to reduce soil erosion on farms. Seeds are planted directly into the soil, without the need for ploughing, and herbicides are used to remove weeds. For this reason, direct seeding is often promoted as an environmentally friendly farming technique.

When herbicide tolerant GM soya was introduced, it became very popular in Argentina, as it fit in perfectly with no tillage. The rate of adoption of GM soya has surpassed even the industry’s highest expectations. Farmers can now use glyphosate to remove weeds in combination with glyphosate-tolerant GM soya.

But problems soon appeared. Although direct seeding has reduced the rate of erosion, new diseases and pests have emerged, and the levels of nitrogen and phosphates in the soil were markedly reduced. Most recently, herbicide-resistant weeds have appeared requiring the use of more poisonous herbicides as mentioned earlier.

Development of land for RR soya plantations has led to deforestation in Argentina, with serious impacts on biodiversity and water resources. "We have already lost more than 130,000ha of forest," says the director of the Argentina’s Fundación Vida Silvestre (Wildlife Foundation), Javier Corcuera. "If we carry on like this we can expect more flooding and less natural resources for the population."

The no-till technique promoted with RR soya as a means of reducing carbon dioxide emission actually produces worse damages by compaction of the ground, requiring more agrochemicals every year.

"In Argentina, the ‘success’ of the GM soya bean story must largely be attributed to marketing by the seed companies involved, rather than scientific evidence and farmer experience," says Walter Pengue, agricultural engineer specialised in genetic improvement at the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

The Institute of Science in Society, PO Box 32097, London NW1

i-sis.org.uk



To: Ish who wrote (107139)8/5/2005 10:47:48 PM
From: Grainne  Respond to of 108807
 
I have no idea where you get the idea that farmers have no more risk of cancer than the population in general, Ish. Can you show me some studies on that? I have never seen any. I think Monsanto is doing all it can to suppress concerns about Roundup in terms of pesticide risk, but if you do a web search, the information is out there, particularly of increased non-Hodgkins lymphoma cases. This study from Sweden is a little technical, and several years old, but did conclude that there is an increased risk:

A case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
and exposure to pesticides
Cancer v.85, i.6, 19nov00

Lennart Hardell, M.D., PhD. 1 *, Mikael Eriksson, M.D., Ph.D. 2

1Department of Oncology, Örebro Medical Center, Örebro, Sweden
2Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

*Correspondence to Lennart Hardell, Department of Oncology, Örebro Medical Center, S-701 85 Örebro, Sweden (lennart.hardell@orebroll.se)

Funded by: Swedish Work Environment Fund Swedish Medical Research Council Örebro County Council Research Committee Örebro Medical Center Research Foundation

Keywords non-Hodgkin lymphoma; pesticides; phenoxyacetic acids; case-control study

Funded by:

Swedish Work Environment Fund

Swedish Medical Research Council

Örebro County Council Research Committee

Örebro Medical Center Research Foundation

Abstract

mindfully.org note:
This study dealt with the following:
Phenoxyacetic acids

MCPA

2,4-D

2,4,5-T

Glyphosate

DDT

mercurial seed dressing

Pyrethrins

Fungicides

Impregnating agents

Chlorophenols

Pentachlorophenol

Arsenic

Creosote

BACKGROUND The incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has increased in most Western countries during the last few decades. Immunodefective conditions are established risk factors. In 1981, the authors reported an increased risk for NHL following exposure to certain pesticides. The current study was designed to further elucidate the importance of phenoxyacetic acids and other pesticides in the etiology of NHL.

METHODS A population-based case-control study in northern and middle Sweden encompassing 442 cases and twice as many controls was performed. Exposure data were ascertained by comprehensive questionnaires, and the questionnaires were supplemented by telephone interviews. In total, 404 cases and 741 controls answered the questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the SAS statistical data program.

RESULTS Increased risk for NHL was found for subjects exposed to herbicides (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.5) and fungicides (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.1-13.0). Among herbicides, the phenoxyacetic acids dominated (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.4); and, when subclassified, one of these, 4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), turned out to be significantly associated with NHL (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.0-6.9). For several categories of herbicides, it was noted that only exposure during the most recent decades before diagnosis of NHL was associated with an increased risk of NHL. Exposure to impregnating agents and insecticides was, at most, only weakly related to NHL.

CONCLUSIONS Exposure to herbicides in total, including phenoxyacetic acids, during the decades before NHL diagnosis resulted in increased risk for NHL. Thus, the risk following exposure was related to the latency period. Fungicides also increased the risk for NHL when combined, but this group consisted of several different agents, and few subjects were exposed to each type of fungicide.

Received: 20 April 1998; Revised: 28 September 1998; Accepted: 28 September 1998

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The mean age-adjusted incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) increased in Sweden yearly by 3.6% in men and by 2.9% in women during the time period from 1958 to 1992.[1] Similarly, NHL also is one of the malignant diseases with the most rapidly increasing incidence in many other countries.[2] Many different environmental exposures have been proposed as etiologic factors.

Certain immunodefective conditions are established risk factors. Thus, immunosuppressive medication after organ transplantation,[3][4] human immunodeficient virus (HIV) infection,[5] and some autoimmune disorders, e.g., Sjögren's syndrome,[6][7] all have been associated with an increased incidence of NHL.

Some indications point to a viral genesis, especially regarding Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and endemic African Burkitt lymphoma.[8] A correlation between malignant lymphoma and elevated EBV antibody titers has been reported in a prospective cohort of healthy adults in Finland.[9] In parts of the world, the retrovirus human T-cell lymphotropic virus I (HTLV-I) is endemic and has been associated with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.[10] However, no known risk factors explain the rapid rise of incidence in many countries, although different theories are debated with more or less support from various investigations.

Some investigators have noticed a covariation between NHL and skin malignancies.[11][12] Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which has been demonstrated to have immunosuppressive effects in experimental animals,[13][14] has been proposed to be the common etiologic factor for both types of malignancies.[15] However, recent studies do not support these allegations.[16-19] Other theories involve chemical substances, both occupational and environmental, in a broader sense, that have been reviewed by us.[20]

Exposure to phenoxyacetic acids and the impregnating agents chlorophenols was first reported in 1979 as a possible risk factor for NHL.[21] This clinical observation was followed by a case-control study on malignant lymphoma, including both NHL and Hodgkin's disease (HD).[22] Increased risks for exposure to phenoxyacetic acids, chlorophenols, and organic solvents were found. Exposure to phenoxyacetic acids, particularly 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), was associated with an increased risk for NHL in subsequent studies in the United States.[23][24]

Increased incidence and mortality of NHL were reported in the Seveso area after an accident in 1976 with trichlorophenol and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) contamination.[25] Cohorts of workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols, and dioxins have shown an excess of NHL.[26][27] Increased risk of NHL has been found also in cohort studies of workers exposed to wood preservatives of the chlorophenol type.[28][29]

The levels of some dioxin and dibenzofuran congeners were significantly higher in the adipose tissue of 7 patients with B-cell malignancies (6 cases with NHL and 1 case with myeloma) compared with 12 surgical controls without malignant disease in a Swedish study.[30] Also, the TCDD toxic equivalent factor (TEF) was significantly higher in the cases. Several studies have reported an association between NHL and exposure to organic solvents including benzene.[22][31-33]

The aim of the present study was to further elucidate exposure to especially pesticides and organic solvents as risk factors for NHL. Moreover, there is a lack of knowledge about the risk, if any, of pesticides presently in use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases

The study encompassed male cases age 25 years with NHL diagnosed during 1987-1990. They were living in the four most northern counties of Sweden (Norrbotten, Västerbotten, Västernorrland, and Jämtland) and in three counties in mid-Sweden (Örebro, Värmland, and Sörmland). All cases who were reported to the regional cancer registries with a histopathologic diagnosis of NHL were included. No case had been included in our previous study on NHL.[22] The pathologic reports were scrutinized for all cases to confirm the diagnosis. Of the initial sample, 29 cases were thereby excluded, 14 due to wrong or uncertain diagnosis and 15 due to wrong year of diagnosis. Finally, 442 cases were included, 210 from the northern part of Sweden and 232 from the middle part of Sweden. Of these cases, 192 were deceased.

Controls

For each living case, two male controls matched for age and county were recruited from the National Population Registry. Thereby, the controls closest in age to the case were selected. For each deceased case, two deceased male controls were identified from the National Registry for Causes of Death. They were matched for age and year of death. For ethical reasons, subjects who had committed suicide were excluded. For deceased subjects, interviews were performed with the next of kin in the order of spouse, child, or other relative, who was identified through local parishes.

Assessment of Exposure

An 18-page questionnaire was mailed to the study subjects or to the next of kin for deceased individuals with an enclosed letter informing them that participation was voluntary. A complete working history was requested as well as information about exposure to different chemicals. For example, regarding the use of pesticides, subjects were asked for use within different occupations, such as forestry, farming, gardening, etc.; wet contact if not handling the sprayer; brand names of the different pesticides; and so on. In-depth knowledge of concentrations of active ingredients usually was lacking. Information also was assessed on years of exposure and cumulative exposure in days. Also, smoking habits, previous diseases, and certain food habits were assessed, the results of which will be presented in another paper. The rather comprehensive questionnaire was used for two reasons. We wanted to cover most of the theories that have been presented regarding the etiology of NHL, but we wished to avoid a focus on exposure to pesticides and organic solvents, i.e., an a priori hypotheses. The questionnaire was somewhat modified and extended compared with earlier questionnaires that we have used and have been evaluated in our studies with findings verified by other research groups.

According to written instructions, a trained interviewer supplemented the answers over the telephone if the information was unclear regarding specified exposures. Most subjects, both cases and controls, were interviewed in this way. The questionnaires were blinded with regard to case or control status, i.e., it was not disclosed during the interviews or coding of the answers whether the subject was a case or a control. Exposure within 1 year prior to diagnosis (corresponding year for the matched control) was disregarded. All interviews were performed during 1993-1995.

Statistical Analysis

Conditional logistic regression analysis for matched studies was performed with the SAS statistical program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Thereby, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained. All 95% CIs were rounded outward, e.g., a 95% CI of 1.07-4.52 is written 1.0-4.6. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. When exposure to different pesticides was analyzed, subjects with no pesticide exposure were taken as unexposed (cf. Table 1).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 1. Number of Exposed Cases and Controls, Odds Ratios, and 95% Confidence Intervals for Exposure to Pesticides

Number of
exposed
Agent cases/controls OR CI
Herbicides 61/81 1.6 1.0-2.5
Phenoxyacetic acids 51/71 1.5 0.9-2.4
MCPA 12/11 2.7 1.0-7.0
2,4-D+2,4,5-T 43/62 1.3 0.7-2.3
Glyphosate 4/3 2.3 0.4-13
Other 12/7 3.4 1.1-9.9
Insecticides 90/139 1.2 0.8-1.7
DDT 66/107 1.1 0.7-1.7
mercurial seed dressing 17/25 1.6 0.7-3.4
pyrethrins 10/21 1.3 0.5-3.4
Fungicides 10/8 3.7 1.1-13
Impregnating agents 86/131 1.2 0.8-1.7
Chlorophenols 57/92 1.1 0.7-1.8
Pentachlorophenol 55/87 1.2 0.7-1.8
Arsenic 7/8 1.2 0.3-4.5
Creosote 15/26 1.2 0.5-2.8
Other 38/41 1.7 0.9-3.2

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; MCPA: 4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxyacetic acid.
RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 404 cases (91%) and 741 controls (84%). Of the living cases, 91% participated compared with 83% of the living controls. The corresponding frequencies for next of kin were 92% of cases and 85% of controls. The mean age of both cases and controls was 65 years (range, 27-84 years for cases and 28-84 years for controls).

The case material was divided into different groups according to histopathology, i.e., B-cell lymphoma of aggressive (n = 157) or indolent (n = 185) types, respectively; T-cell lymphoma (n = 18); and other (n = 6) or unspecified types (n = 38). Exposure to herbicides resulted in an increased risk for NHL that, for specific agents, was highest for exposure to 4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxyacetic acid (MCPA; Table 1).

Exposure to each herbicide (MCPA, 2,4-D/2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid [2,4,5-T], glyphosate, and others) was analyzed separately (Table 2). Dose response calculations also were performed by comparing high and low dose exposures divided by the median exposure time given in days (Table 2).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 2. Exposure to Different Types of Herbicides with Dose Response Calculations a

Median
Agent Total OR (CI) no.(days) Low OR (CI) High OR (CI)
Herbicides 1.6(1.0-2.5) 32 1.5(0.8-2.7) 1.8(0.9-3.2)
Phenoxyacetic acids 1.5(0.9-2.4) 30 1.6(0.8-3.0) 1.3(0.6-2.5)
MCPA 2.7(1.0-7.0) 26 1.7(0.4-6.5) 4.1(1.0-17)
2,4-D+2,4,5-T 1.3(0.7-2.3) 30 1.7(0.8-3.3) 1.0(0.4-2.2)
Other 3.0(1.1-7.9) 8 2.0(0.5-7.4) 6.8(1.4-33)
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; MCPA: 4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxyacetic acid.
a High exposure is defined as > median number of days for exposed subjects.
ORs with regard to different latency (induction) periods, i.e., time from first exposure to diagnosis, were calculated (Table 3). For herbicides in total and for phenoxyacetic acids, the highest risks were seen when first exposure occurred 10-20 years before diagnosis, although a somewhat different pattern was seen for exposure to MCPA.

Table 3. Exposure to Phenoxyacetic Acids, Impregnating Agents, and Organic Solvents a

Agent Latency period (yrs)
1-10 OR (CI) >10-20 OR (CI) >20-30 OR (CI) >30 OR (CI)
Phenoxyacetic acids - b 3.7 (0.9-15) 1.6 (0.7-3.6) 1.2 (0.6-2.1)
MCPA - b 3.6 (0.3-36) 0.5 (0.1-4.6) 4.8 (1.3-19)
2,4-D+2,4,5-T - c 2.7 (0.7-12) 2.1 (0.9-5.1) 0.9 (0.4-1.7)
Impregnating agents 0.6 (0.1-3.7) 2.2 (0.9-5.2) 1.1 (0.5-2.3) 1.1 (0.7-1.7)
Chlorophenols - c 0.9 (0.3-2.9) 1.8 (0.7-4.3) 1.1 (0.6-1.8)
Pentachlorophenol - c 1.0 (0.3-2.9) 2.0 (0.7-5.3) 1.1 (0.7-1.8)
Creosote - b 2.0 (0.1-32) 2.0 (0.1-32) 1.3 (0.5-3.0)

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; MCPA: 4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxyacetic acid.
a Calculations are made with exposure divided according to time from first exposure to
diagnosis (latency period). b No exposed cases, one exposed control. c No exposed subjects.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Time to diagnosis from last exposure to phenoxyacetic acids also was used in the calculation of the risk for NHL (Table 4). The OR was highest for exposure 1-10 years prior to diagnosis, whereas no increased risk was seen for those with the most recent exposure >20 years from the time of diagnosis.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 4. Exposure to Phenoxyacetic Acids, Impregnating Agents, and Organic Solvents a

Agent Time from last exposure to diagnosis
1-10 yrs OR(CI) >10-20 yrs OR(CI) >20-30 yrs OR(CI) >30 yrs OR(CI)
Phenoxyacetic acids 3.7 (1.2-11) 2.1 (0.9-4.8) 1.0 (0.4-2.1) 0.7 (0.2-2.1)
MCPA 3.0 (0.7-13) 5.2 (0.5-51) 1.2 (0.1-7.1) - b
2,4-D+2,4,5-T 3.3 (0.6-18) 1.9 (0.8-4.4) 1.0 (0.4-2.3) 0.9 (0.3-2.5)
Impregnating agents 1.6 (0.9-2.6) 0.8 (0.3-1.9) 1.2 (0.5-2.4) 0.9 (0.4-1.9)
Chlorophenols - b 1.3 (0.8-2.3) 1.1 (0.4-2.8) 0.6 (0.2-1.7)
Pentachlorophenol - b 1.4 (0.8-2.4) 1.1 (0.4-2.6) 0.6 (0.1-1.9)
Creosote 2.3 (0.4-15) - c 0.9 (0.2-3.2) 1.5 (0.4-5.4)

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; MCPA: 4-chloro-2-methyl
phenoxyacetic acid.
a Calculations were made with exposure divided according to time from last
exposure to diagnosis.
b One exposed case, no exposed controls.
c No exposed cases, four exposed controls.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Furthermore, an analysis of the importance of exposure to phenoxyacetic acids during different decades showed increased risk for subjects during recent decades (Table 5). Similar calculations were performed for exposure to chlorophenols and organic solvents without any obvious pattern (data not shown).

Table 5. Exposure to Phenoxyacetic Acids During Different Decades a

Decade Cases/controls OR CI
1940s 2/6 0.9 0.1-4.9
1950s 29/45 1.0 0.5-1.8
1960s 35/47 1.6 0.9-2.8
1970s 25/21 2.8 1.3-5.6
1980s 10/7 4.0 1.2-13

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
a Note that one subject may be included in several decades.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Both exposure to glyphosate and other herbicides (Table 1) yielded increased risks for NHL. Among the different agents mentioned it is noted that 3 cases but no control were exposed to chlorosulphuron, and 4 cases and 3 controls were exposed to glyphosate.

Exposure to insecticides did not increase the risk for NHL (Table 1). Conversely, exposure in agriculture to fungicides resulted in an increased risk with a dose response effect. Thus, exposure 10 days (median number of exposure days) resulted in an OR of 1.4 (95% CI, 0.3-7.2) versus exposure >10 days, which resulted in an OR of 8.0 (95% CI, 0.9-72.0). In total, nine different fungicides were specified, however, there were few exposed subjects for each fungicide. It might be mentioned that four cases versus no controls reported exposure to dinocap. Neither chlorophenols nor other impregnating agents yielded an increased risk for NHL (Table 1).

Exposure to organic solvents did not increase the risk for NHL (Table 6). An increased risk was seen only when exposure with a latency period > 20-30 years was considered (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9-2.6), but not with other latency criteria. When organic solvents were subclassified, no significantly increased ORs were found, but it may be noteworthy that exposure to air fuel (e.g., the MC77 type) was mentioned by four cases but by only one control.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 6. Number of Exposed Cases Controls with Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Other Exposures with at Least Ten Exposed Subjects

Number of
exposed
Agent cases/controls OR CI
Ammonia 4/7 1.1 0.3-3.7
Asbestos 105/185 1.0 0.7-1.4
Chlorine 7/13 1.0 0.3-2.5
Cleaner 10/13 1.2 0.4-3.0
Cutting oils 30/44 1.2 0.7-2.1
Diesel 17/15 2.1 0.9-4.5
Glass wool 63/76 1.5 1.0-2.3
Insect repellents 188/346 1.0 0.7-1.3
Lead compounds 5/14 0.8 0.3-2.7
Lye 6/11 1.0 0.3-2.7
Mineral wool 53/87 1.1 0.7-1.6
Oil 33/60 1.0 0.6-1.7
Organic solvents 199/349 1.1 0.8-1.4
Plastics 14/25 1.1 0.5-2.2
Sulfur compounds 14/17 1.6 0.7-3.4
Wood glue 41/71 1.1 0.7-1.7

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exposure to a number of other agents also was assessed (Table 6). Diesel increased the risk for NHL, and this risk was restricted to exposure > 30 days (median number of exposure days; OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-10.4). Glass wool increased the risk, but produced no dose response effect.

Multivariate analysis of exposure to phenoxyacetic acids, other herbicides, and fungicides is presented in Table 7. The highest risk was found for exposure to herbicides other than phenoxyacetic acids. Increased risk also was found for exposure to fungicides, whereas the risk for MCPA was lower than in the univariate analysis. Exposure to glyphosate and phenoxy herbicides was considered in a separate multivariate analysis. For glyphosate, an OR of 5.8 (95% CI, 0.6-54) was found. For phenoxyacetic acids, an OR of 1.4 (95% CI, 0.8-2.2) was found.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 7. Multivariate Analysis of Different Exposures

Agent Univariate Multivariate
OR CI OR CI
MCPA 2.7 1.0-7.0 1.3 0.4-3.9
2,4-D+2,4,5-T 1.3 0.7-2.3 1.2 0.6-2.0
Other herbicides 3.0 1.1-7.9 2.1 1.0-8.0
Fungicides 3.7 1.1-13 2.6 0.7-9.1

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; MCPA: 4-chloro-2-methyl
phenoxyacetic acid.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCUSSION

This study was population based, using the Swedish Cancer Registry to identify the cases. The Swedish compulsory reporting system for malignant diseases makes it likely that almost all incident cases in the study area during the 4 years of inclusion were used. To avoid any selection of cases associated with prognosis, both living and deceased cases with NHL were included in this case-control study. To assess exposure in an equal manner for both cases and controls and to minimize recall bias, deceased controls were used for deceased cases. All interviews and coding of data were performed blinded with regard to case or control status to minimize observational bias. For the same reason, the interviews followed detailed, written instructions, asking for specific information on various occupations, including type of work, name of chemical used, number of working days, exposure conditions, etc. All answers were scrutinized by us according to the written criteria and, if necessary, supplemented further over the telephone. Thereby, exposure information was assessed in a similar manner for both cases and controls.

Regarding farmers and lumberjacks, the questionnaire data had to be supplemented over the telephone for all subjects due to the detailed, written instructions for the interviews. Thereby, exposure data were qualified regarding type of chemical used, years and number of days for exposure, methods of use, etc. Regarding the questions on exposure to pesticides, one case had answered do not know, and another did not answer these questions at all. Both turned out to be exposed during the supplementary telephone interviews. Three controls had answered the questions on pesticide use with no. All of them were classified as exposed after the telephone interviews. For the rest of the cases and controls who had stated pesticide exposure in the questionnaires, the telephone interviews verified such exposure. Thus, it is unlikely that observational bias was introduced during the telephone interviews. Excluding these additional two cases and three controls with pesticide exposure did not significantly change the results.

In this study, exposure to both herbicides and fungicides resulted in significantly increased risks for NHL. Among herbicides, the phenoxyacetic acids constituted the main exposure category. These have been shown to increase the risk for NHL in several earlier studies.[16][22-24][26][27] In this study, however, the risk of increase was restricted to exposure during the last two decades preceding the diagnosis. In fact, a decreasing risk was found with increasing time since last exposure.

The combination of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, which constituted Agent Orange in U.S. warfare in Vietnam, was the most predominantly used herbicides in Swedish forestry. Since 2,4,5-T was banned in Sweden in 1977 because of its toxic properties, including the contamination with TCDD, no subjects in this study had their first exposure to this substance during the 10-year period preceding NHL diagnosis. Thus, it seems to be difficult to demonstrate any lymphomagenic effect from 2,4,5-T in subjects with lymphoma diagnosis during later years.

The phenoxyacetic acid MCPA, which is still much in use in agriculture as a weed killer, turned out to be a risk factor for NHL in this study based on the univariate analysis and the dose response calculations, although the multivariate analysis was less convincing. However, time from last exposure to diagnosis was not considered in the multivariate analysis. Thus, regarding lymphomagenesis, the univariate analysis may be more informative than the multivariate analysis (cf. Table 4). It is interesting to note that MCPA is not contaminated with dioxins. MCPA has not been debated much previously as carcinogenic; however, in our earlier study on NHL, four cases versus no controls were exposed to MCPA only.[16] Thus, the increased risk for NHL from exposure to phenoxyacetic acids may not depend on dioxins, even though some studies have associated exposure to TCDD with an increased risk for NHL.[25-27] This seems to be in contrast with the situation for soft tissue sarcoma, which has been associated mainly with TCDD and phenoxyacetic acids contaminated with that substance.[20]

In a multivariate analysis, exposure to both fungicides and herbicides was still a risk factor for NHL, although not exposure specifically to phenoxyacetic acids. It is important to note that the multivariate analysis included all exposure regardless of time period, and, in the univariate analysis, no statistically significant increased risk was found for exposure to phenoxyacetic acids, with the exception of MCPA. The interesting finding of an increased risk for exposure to phenoxyacetic acids during only the two decades prior to diagnosis of NHL (see Table 4), for technical reasons, was not investigated by multivariate methods. Furthermore, due to low numbers of exposed subjects in some of the categories, definite conclusions cannot be drawn for separate chemicals, such as MCPA and glyphosate, from the multivariate analysis.

Chlorophenols, which are chemically related to phenoxyacetic acids and have been used as, e.g., wood preservatives, were banned in Sweden in 1977. In the current study, exposure to these agents did not produce any significantly increased risk for NHL, in contrast to previous findings.[22] The possibility that this difference depends on a lack of late exposure cannot be ruled out.

Although they constitute a diversity of agents with few subjects exposed to each of them, fungicides, when combined, resulted in an increased risk for NHL in this study. Because such an association has not been described previously, further studies are necessary.

Regarding organic solvents, this investigation did not confirm previous results of an association.[22][31-33] The result of an increased risk found for the latency period of 20-30 years might be a chance result. Another possibility might be that most of the solvents that have been in use during more recent years are chemically different from previously used and are handled under better hygienic conditions.[34]

Furthermore, glass wool turned out to be a risk factor for NHL in this study, an association that has not been reported previously. It may be a random finding, which is supported by the lack of dose response effect.

The findings in this study support the role for chemical agents in the etiology of NHL. Exposure to pesticides and organic solvents as risk factors for NHL were a priori hypotheses. Thus, it is less likely that the results may be explained by multiple comparisons in the analysis, although that possibility cannot be ruled out completely. Many of the pesticides used during more recent years (e.g., the phenoxyacetic acids) were introduced after World War II, which could explain in part the increase in incidence during the same time period noted in many countries. Bearing in mind that immunosuppression is an established risk factor for NHL, it is interesting to note the immunotoxic effect reported for some pesticides, e.g., phenoxyacetic acids[35] and chlorophenols.[36][37]

Viruses have been associated with lymphomas in animals.[38][39] Burkitt lymphoma in East Africa is strongly correlated with EBV,[8] and HTLV-I seems to cause T-cell lymphoma in some parts of the world.[10]

Virus proliferation is held back by the immune system, and immunologic impairment may have been followed by development of B-cell lymphoma[40] and T-cell lymphoma[41] in animal studies. It should be noted that, in renal transplant patients, NHL is most common in the first year after transplantation.[42] The incidence then falls to a fairly constant level. It has been suggested that development of NHL in these patients depends on factors present at the time of exposure to immunosuppressants, i.e., almost always EBV infection. These observations are of potential interest in relation to our finding of highest risk for herbicide exposure 1-10 year prior to diagnosis and decreasing risk for longer time spans (see Table 4).

Some of the chemicals with obvious hazardous effects, as shown by this and other studies, are banned in several countries. It is important to stress the finding of MCPA as a lympoamagenic substance found in this investigation, because this chemical is still used widely in agriculture as a weed killer.

Other much used pesticides, e.g., glyphosate, also might be of concern. In fact, in this study, four cases and three controls were exposed to this herbicide (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.4-13). Since the time period for diagnosis in this study, the use of glyphosate has increased dramatically, especially during the 1990s, and it is now the most common herbicide used in Sweden.[43] Gene mutations[44-46] and chromosomal aberrations[47] have been reported in mouse lymphoma cells exposed for glyphosate. Furthermore, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, leukemia, and lymphoma was somewhat increased in one study on mice.[48] In culture of human lymphocytes, glyphosate increased the number of sister chromatid exchanges.[49] Recently, we published an increased risk for hairy cell leukemia, a rare type of NHL, for subjects exposed to glyphosate as well as for subjects exposed to other pesticides.[50] For these reasons, glyphosate deserves further epidemiologic studies.

Other environmental chemicals also might be of concern in lymphomagenesis. Thus, increased concentrations of PCBs[51][52] and chlordanes[53] have been reported in NHL patients. These substances are immunotoxic as well.[54][55] In conclusion, this study supports the role of certain chemicals for the development of NHL. On the basis of this study, the risk seems to decrease with time after last exposure.

Acknowledgements

Michael Carlberg, B.Sc., assisted in the statistical calculations. The assistance of Mrs. Gudrun Byström during the interviews and Ms. Iréne Larsson and Mrs. Monica Sandströn in the data collection is acknowledged. Dr Anders Seldén, M.D., Ph.D., contributed in the evaluation of chemical exposures.

References

1 Nordström M. Increasing incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in Sweden 1958-1992. Oncol Rep 1996; 3: 645-9.

2 Rabkin CS, Devesa SS, Hoar Zahm S, Gail MH. Increasing incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Semin Hematol 1993; 30: 286-96.

3 Penn I, Hammond W, Brettschneider I, Starzl TE. Malignant lymphomas in transplantation patients. Transplant Proc 1969; 1: 106-12.

4 Kinlen LJ, Sheil AGR, Peto J, Doll R. Collaborative United Kingdom-Australiasian study of cancer in patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs. Br Med J 1979; II: 1461-6.

5 Ziegler JL, Beckstead JA, Volberding PA, Abrams DJ, Levine AM, Lukes RJ, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 90 homosexual men: relationship to generalized lymphadenopathy and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 565-70.

6 Rothman S, Block M, Hauser FV. Sjögren's syndrome associated with lymphoblastoma and hypersplenism. Arch Dermatol Syphiol 1951; 63: 642-3. Links

7 Tatal N, Bunim JJ. The development of malignant lymphoma in the course of Sjögren's syndrome. Am J Med 1964; 36: 529-40.

8 Evans AS, Mueller NE. Viruses and cancer: causal associations. Ann Epidemiol 1990; 1: 71-92.

9 Lehtinen T, Lumio J, Dillner J, Hakama M, Knekt P, Lehtinen M, et al. Increased risk of malignant lymphoma indicated by elevated Epstein-Barr virus antibodies - a prospective study. Cancer Causes Control 1993; 4: 187-93. Links

10 Tajima K. The 4th nation-wide study of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) in Japan: estimates of risk of ATL and its geographical and clinical features. The T- and B-cell Malignancy Study Group. Int J Cancer 1990;45: 237-43.

11 Travis LB, Curtis RE, Glimelius B, Holowaty E, Van Leeuven FE, Lynch CF, et al. Second cancers among long-term survivors of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1932-7.

12 Levi F, Randimbison L, Te VC, La Vecchia C. Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, chronic lymphocytic leukaemias and skin cancers. Br J Cancer 1996; 74: 1847-50.

13 Cruz PD Jr. Ultraviolet B (UVB)-induced immunosuppression: biologic, cellular, and molecular effects. Adv Dermatol 1994;9: 79-94.

14 Grabbe S, Granstein RD. Mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation carcinogenesis. Chem Immunol 1994; 58: 291-313.

15 Melbye M, Adami HO, Hjalmgrim H, Glimelius B. Ultraviolet light and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Acta Oncol 1996; 35: 655-7.

16 Hardell L, Eriksson M, Degerman A. Exposure to phenoxyacetic acids, chlorophenols, or organic solvents in relation to histopathology, stage, and anatomical localization of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 2386-9.

17 Hartge P, Devesa SS, Grauman D, Fears TR, Fraumeni JF Jr. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and sunlight. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88: 298-300.

18 Freedman DM, Hoar Zahm S, Dosemeci M. Residential and occupational exposure to sunlight and mortality from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: composite (threefold) case-control study. Br Med J 1997; 314: 1451-5.

19 Nordström M, Hardell L, Magnuson A, Hagberg H, Rask-Andersen A. Occupation and occupational exposure to UV-light as risk factors for hairy cell leukemia evaluated in a case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prevent 1997; 6: 467-72. Links

20 Hardell L, Eriksson M, Axelson O, Hoar Zahm S. Cancer epidemiology. In: Dioxins and health. Schecter A , editor. New York: Plenum Press, 1994: 525-47.

21 Hardell L. Malignant lymphoma of histiocytic type and exposure to phenxoyacetic acids or chlorophenols. Lancet 1979; i: 55-6.

22 Hardell L, Eriksson M, Lenner P, Lundgren E. Malignant lymphoma and exposure to chemicals, especially organic solvents, chlorophenols and phenoxy acids: a case-control study. Br J Cancer 1981; 43: 169-76.

23 Hoar SK, Blair A, Holmes FF, Boysen CD, Robel RJ, Hober R, et al. Agricultural herbicide use and risk of lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. JAMA 1986; 256: 1141-7.

24 Hoar Zahm S, Weisenburger DD, Babbitt PA, Saal RC, Vaught JB, Cantor KP, et al. A case-control study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in Eastern Nebraska. Epidemiology 1990; 1: 349-56.

25 Bertazzi PA, Pesatori AC, Consonni D, Tironi A, Landi MT, Zochettis C. Cancer incidence in a population accidentally exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-para-dioxin. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 398-406.

26 Kogevinas M, Kauppinen T, Winkelmann R, Johnson ES, Bertazzi PA, Buneo de Mesquita BH. Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols, and dioxins: two nested case-controls studies. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 396-402.

27 Becher H, Flesch-Janys D, Kauppinen T, Kogevinas M, Steindorf K, Manz A, et al. Cancer mortality in German male workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides and dioxins. Cancer Causes Control 1996; 7: 312-21.

28 Ramlow JM, Spadacene NW, Hoag SR, Stafford BA, Cartmill JB, Lerner PJ. Mortality in a cohort of pentachlorophenol manufacturing workers, 1940-1989. Am J Ind Med 1996; 30: 180-94.

29 Hertzman C, Teschke K, Ostry A, Hershler R, Dimich-Ward H, Kelly S, et al. Mortality and cancer incidence among sawmill workers exposed to chlorophenate wood preservatives. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 71-9.

30 Hardell L, Fredrikson M, Eriksson M, Hansson M, Rappe C. Adipose tissue concentrations of dioxins and dibenzofurans in patients with malignant lymphoproliferative diseases and in patients without a malignant disease. Eur J Cancer Prevent 1995; 4: 225-9.

31 Vianna NJ, Polan A. Lymphomas and occupational benzene exposure. Lancet 1979; 2: 1394-5.

32 Olsson H, Brandt L. Risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among men occupationally exposed to organic solvents. Scand J Work Environ Health 1988; 14: 246-51.

33 Yin SN, Hayes RB, Linet MS, Li GL, Dosemeci M, Travis LB, et al. An expanded cohort study of cancer among benzene-exposed workers in China. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104(Suppl 6): 1339-41.

34 Axelson O. Hogstedt C. The health effects of solvents. In: Occupational medicine. Zenz C , Dickerson OB , Horvath EP Jr., editors. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994: 764-78.

35 Faustini A, Settimi L, Pacifici R, Fano V, Zuccaro P, Forastiere F. Immunological changes among farmers exposed to phenoxy herbicides: preliminary observations. Occup Environ Med 1996; 53: 583-5.

36 Exon JH, Koller LD. Effects of chlorinated phenols on immunity in rats. Int J Immunopharmacol 1985; 7: 239-47.

37 Daniel V, Huber W, Bauer K, Opelz G. Impaired in-vitro lymphocytes responses in patients with elevated pentachlorophenol (PCP) blood levels. Arch Environ Health 1995; 50: 287-92.

38 Kaplan HS. From experimental animal models to human lymphoid neoplasia: search for viral etiology. Recent Results Cancer Res 1978; 64: 325-36.

39 Armenian HK, Hamaden RR. Epidemiology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In: Reviews in cancer epidemiology. vol 2. Lilienfeldt AM , editor. New York: Elsevier, 1983: 141-69.

40 Potter M. Pathogenetic mechanisms in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in humans. Cancer Res 1992; 52(Suppl): 5522s-8.

41 Manzari V, Gismondi A, Barillari G, Morrone S, Modesti G, Albonici L, et al. HTLV-V: a new human retrovirus isolated in a TAC-negative T-cell lymphoma/leukemia. Science 1987; 238: 1581-3.

42 Newstead CG. Assessment of risk of cancer after renal transplanatation. Lancet 1998:351: 610-1.

43 National Chemicals Inspectorate. Sold quantities of pesticides 1996. Solna, Sweden: National Chemicals Inspectorate, 1997.

44 Majeska JB, Matheson DW. R-50224: mutagenicity evaluation in mouse lymphoma multiple endpoint test. A forward mutagenicity assay. T-10848. Farmington: Stauffer Chemical Company, 1982.

45 Majeska JB, Matheson DW. R-50224, sample 3: mutagenicity evaluation in mouse lymphoma multiple endpoint test. Forward mutation assay. T-11018. Farmington: Stauffer Chemical Company, 1982.

46 Majeska JB, Matheson DW. SC-0224: mutagnicity evaluation in mouse lymphoma multiple endpoint test. Forward mutation assay. T-12661. Farmington: Stauffer Chemical Company, 1985.

47 Majeska JB, Matheson DW. SC-0224: mutagenicity evaluation in mouse lymphoma multiple endpoint test, cytogenetic assay. T-12662. Farmington: Stauffer Chemical Company, 1985.

48 Pavkov KL, Turnier JC. 2-Year chronic toxicity and oncogenicity dietary study with SC-0224 in mice. T-11813. Farmington: Stauffer Chemical Company, 1986.

49 Vigfusson NV, Vyse ER. The effect of the pesticides, Dexon, Captan and Roundup, on sister-chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutat Res 1980; 79: 53-7.

50 Nordström M, Hardell L, Magnuson A, Hagberg H, Rask-Andersen A. Occupational exposures, animal exposure and smoking as risk factors for hairy cell leukaemia evaluated in a case-control study. Br J Cancer 1998; 77: 2048-52.

51 Hardell L, van Bavel B, Lindström G, Fredrikson M, Hagberg H, Liljegren G, et al. Higher concentrations of specific polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in adipose tissue from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients compared with controls without a malignant disease. Int J Oncol 1996; 9: 603-8.

52 Rothman N, Cantor KP, Blair A, Bush D, Brock JW, Helzlsouer K, et al. A nested case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and serum organochlorine residues. Lancet 1997; 350: 240-4.

53 Hardell L, Liljegren G, Lindström G, Van Bavel B, Broman K, Fredrikson M, et al. Increased concentrations of chlordane in adipose tissue from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients compared with controls without a malignant disease. Int J Oncol 1996; 9: 1139-42.

54 Lu YC, Wu YC. Clinical findings and immunological abnormalities in Yu-Cheng patients. Environ Health Perspect 1985; 59: 17-29.

55 McConnachie PR, Zahalasky AC. Immune alterations in humans exposed to the termiticide technical chlordane. Arch Environ Health 1992; 47: 295-301.

mindfully.org



To: Ish who wrote (107139)8/5/2005 10:54:52 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Here is another article about the specific cancers that farmers are more susceptible to than the general population, noting also that farmers as a group are pretty healthy:

RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH WEEKLY #375 .

. ---February 3, 1994--- .

. HEADLINES: .

. CANCER DOWN ON THE FARM .

. ========== .

. Environmental Research Foundation .

. P.O. Box 5036, Annapolis, MD 21403 .

. Fax (410) 263-8944; Internet: erf@rachel.org .

. ========== .

. Back issues available by E-mail; to get instructions, send .

. E-mail to INFO@rachel.org with the single word HELP .

. in the message; back issues also available via ftp from .

. ftp.std.com/periodicals/rachel, from gopher.std.com .

. and from monitor.net .

. Subscriptions are free. To subscribe, E-mail the words .

. SUBSCRIBE RACHEL-WEEKLY YOUR NAME to: listserv@rachel.org. .

=================================================================

CANCER DOWN ON THE FARM

The U.S. is losing its war on cancer, according to a long article

in the January, 1994 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN.[1] The basic measure

of success or failure -- the age-adjusted cancer death rate

-- continues to climb slowly year after year, despite $25 billion

spent to find a cure since 1971 when Richard Nixon declared a

national "war on cancer."

The cancer establishment--the largely male, largely white and

largely elderly group of researchers who act as gatekeepers for

cancer research dollars--try to put a good face on it. They

point to reductions in deaths from childhood cancers, reductions

in cancer deaths among young adults, and reductions in deaths

from some specific cancers. Still the fact remains that the

total age-adjusted death rate for cancer continues to climb year

after year. The rise in the cancer death rate is particularly

steep among people 65 and over.

The cancer establishment tends to blame cancer on individual

lifestyles, such as diets high in fat and low in fiber. There is

one major problem with this argument. Heart disease is known to

be associated with cigarette smoking, heavy use of alcohol, and

diets high in fat and low in fiber and low in antioxidants

[beta-carotene, vitamin E and selenium, for example]. In several

countries heart disease rates are decreasing. In the U.S., heart

disease is down 40% from its peak in the 1960s. It therefore

seems unlikely that recent increases in cancer are caused by the

same factors that cause heart disease.

Now a group of younger cancer researchers is advocating a return

to the fundamental principles of public health developed during

the 19th century, based on prevention. Much of cancer is thought

to be preventable because rates of occurrence and death vary

substantially from one population to another. Environmental

factors are likely to account for much of this variation.

Between 1969 and 1986, several cancers increased significantly

among persons aged 64 to 84 in six industrial countries.[2]

Multiple myeloma [cancer that starts in the bone marrow and

spreads to various bones, especially the skull], melanoma of the

skin, and cancers of the prostate, bladder, brain, lung and

breast are increasing in the general population of several

industrial countries. Except in the case of lung cancer, these

increases remain largely unexplained.

In the last two years, cancer prevention researchers have focused

new attention on environmental chemicals. Devra Lee Davis and

others have developed a hypothesis about the cause of breast

cancer in women. For a long time researchers have known that

exposure to estrogen (the female hormone) increases a woman's

risk of breast cancer. Now Davis has shown that many fat-soluble

industrial chemicals, widely distributed in the environment,

mimic or amplify the biological effects of estrogen.[3] [See

RHWN #369.] The National Cancer Institute is now planning to

establish a laboratory to study "hormonal carcinogenesis"

(hormones as causes of cancer).

Now a second hypothesis has been developed by Devra Davis, Aaron

Blair, Sheila Hoar Zahm, Neil Pearce, Joseph Fraumeni, and others

at the National Cancer Institute, asking about the role of

pesticides in certain cancers. The hypothesis begins by

examining the health of farmers.

Two million farm workers, and three million farmers and their

families, form a large occupational group exposed to toxic

chemicals.[4] Farmers are a relatively healthy group. For any

given age, farmers have a low overall mortality rate, indicating

general good health. Compared to the general public, farmers

have lower risk for ischemic heart disease [narrowing of the

coronary arteries], and for all causes of cancer combined.[5]

Farmers also have lower risks for cancers of the lung, esophagus,

bladder, colon, liver, and kidney.

Low rates of cancer for lung, esophagus, and bladder, and low

rates of heart disease, can be explained by low prevalence of

smoking among farmers, which has been noted in numerous studies.

In addition, farmers have a low percentage of body fat, and a

high measure of physical fitness, probably because they perform

hard physical labor that keeps them in good shape. This good

physical condition probably contributes to lower risks for heart

disease and colon cancer, both of which are associated with a

sedentary lifestyle.

Farmers also eat a relatively large amount of fruits and

vegetables, compared to the average American, and relatively

small amounts of processed foods. As a consequence, farmers'

diets are most likely higher in fiber than the average diet.

Furthermore, in general, farmers reside in areas with little air

pollution.

However, despite their generally good health, farmers have

higher-than-general-population risks for certain cancers:

non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, skin melanomas, multiple myeloma,

leukemia [cancer of the blood-forming organs], and cancers of the

lip, stomach, prostate, and brain.

These high rates of a few select cancers among farmers, against a

background of low risks for most cancers and for non-cancer

diseases, suggests that work-related exposures may be causing

specific cancers among farmers.

These patterns may have broad public health implications since

several of the high-rate tumors among farmers are the same

cancers that appear to be increasing in the general population of

many developed countries: multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's

lymphoma, melanoma of the skin, and cancers of the prostate and

brain.

There are several factors that could be causing these cancers

among farmers: farmers are out in the sun a lot, and ultraviolet

sunlight is associated with melanoma and cancer of the lip.

Exposure to phenoxy herbicides (2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, acilfluorfen,

CNP, erbon, mecoprop, and others) has been linked to

non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and to soft tissue sarcoma.[6] Exposure

to insecticides has been associated with leukemia, multiple

myeloma, and brain cancer. It is possible that animal viruses

may play a role in some farmers' cancers because elevated risks

of leukemia, soft tissue sarcoma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma have

been seen in slaughterhouse workers and veterinarians.

But there is also another possibility. Perhaps something in the

environment damages the immune systems of farmers, who then fall

prey to cancers that healthy immune systems would have been able

to ward off.

It is noteworthy that the same cancers that affect farmers also

affect people whose immune systems have been damaged by disease,

or by medical intervention. Patients with AIDS (acquired immune

deficiency syndrome) experience striking excesses in

non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. (However, the AIDS epidemic does not

provide a complete explanation for the increase in non-Hodgkin's

lymphoma among the general population. The general increase

started before the AIDS epidemic began. In the U.S., the

greatest increases in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma,

and leukemia have occurred in rural agricultural areas of the

central region of the country.)

People who have organ transplants are given drugs to suppress

their immune systems because the immune system would normally

reject a foreign organ; these people, too, have high rates of

non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Brain and skin cancers occur among bone

marrow transplant recipients; soft-tissue sarcomas, skin

melanomas, and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin and lip occur

in kidney transplant patients; leukemia and stomach cancers occur

in people with immunodeficiency diseases.

This similarity between cancers associated with immunosuppression

and cancers among farmers suggests that farmers' cancers may be

caused by environmental factors that damage the immune system.

There is a large and convincing body of evidence showing that

pesticides harm the immune systems of laboratory animals.[7]

However, the number of human studies is very small. In humans,

pesticide exposures have been linked to a variety of immune

system effects including decreased host resistance to disease;

suppressed T-cell activity; enhanced B-and T-cell immune

response; and contact hypersensitivity. T-and B-cells are

particular kinds of cells that circulate in the blood and protect

the body by fighting off bacteria, viruses and cancer cells.

Increasingly, the general public is exposed to the same chemicals

that farmers are exposed to. And, as we saw last week, there is

evidence that immune disorders are increasing in the general

population. The hypothesis of Davis and her colleagues, that

chemicals (or other factors) on farms are increasing the cancer

rates among farmers, could have important consequences for us

all. It represents a new kind of tough, creative thinking that

has been missing from the war on cancer up until now.

--Peter Montague

===============

[1] Tim Beardsley, "A War Not Won--Trends in Cancer

Epidemiology," SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Vol. 270 (January 1994), pgs.

130-138.

[2] Devra Lee Davis, David Hoel, John Fox, and Alan Lopez,

"International Trends in Cancer Mortality in France, West

Germany, Italy, Japan, England and Wales, and the USA," THE

LANCET Vol. 366, No. 8713 (August 25, 1990), pgs. 474-481.

[3] Devra Lee Davis and others, "Medical Hypothesis:

Xenoestrogens As Preventable Causes of Breast Cancer,"

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES Vol. 101 (October 1993), pgs.

372-377.

[4] Marion Moses, "Pesticide-Related Health Problems and

Farmworkers," AAOHN [AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

NURSES] JOURNAL Vol. 37 (March 1989), pgs. 115-130.

[5] Devra Lee Davis and others, "Agricultural Exposures and

Cancer Trends in Developed Countries," ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

PERSPECTIVES Vol. 100 (1992), pgs. 39-44. And: Aaron Blair and

others, "Clues to cancer etiology from studies of farmers,"

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK, ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH Vol. 18

(1992), pgs. 209-215.

[6] See studies of farmers and others reviewed in the Institute

of Medicine's study, VETERANS AND AGENT ORANGE: HEALTH EFFECTS OF

HERBICIDES USED IN VIETNAM (Washington, D.C.: National Academy

Press, 1993).

[7] P.T. Thomas and others, "Immunologic Effects of Pesticides,"

in Scott R. Baker and Chris F. Wilkinson, editors, THE EFFECTS OF

PESTICIDES ON HUMAN HEALTH (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Scientific

Publishing, 1990), pgs. 261-295.

monitor.net



To: Ish who wrote (107139)8/5/2005 10:57:30 PM
From: Grainne  Respond to of 108807
 
Now here is another article about farmers, pesticide exposure and cancer:

Farm Harm: Ag chemicals may cause prostate cancer
Ben Harder

On-the-job exposure to certain agricultural chemicals may be responsible for farmers' high rates of prostate cancer, suggest data from a large, ongoing study in two states. Farmers with relatives who have had prostate cancer may also face an elevated risk from additional chemicals that don't seem to cause problems in the larger group, says Michael Alavanja of the National Cancer Institute in Rockville, Md.

"There is a wealth of evidence that farmers tend to be at high risk of prostate cancer," says Marie-Élise Parent, a cancer epidemiologist at the University of Quebec in Laval, who isn't involved in the new study. Researchers haven't yet determined what puts farmers at greater risk than other people, but occupational exposure to pesticides, gasoline, and solvents may play a role, she says. Some pesticides appear to mimic the actions of hormones and thus cause cancer of such organs as the prostate and breast (SN: 1/23/99, p. 56).

To investigate the possible influence of 50 different pesticides, Alavanja and his colleagues surveyed 55,332 men who had worked as farmers or professional pesticide applicators in either Iowa or North Carolina. The researchers asked the men about past pesticide exposure, family medical history, age, diet, and behaviors such as smoking and using protective gear while spreading chemicals. When the volunteers joined the study between 1993 and 1997, none had prostate cancer. By 1999, however, 566 of them had been diagnosed with the cancer. That number is 14 percent higher than would be predicted from the general rates of the cancer among men in Iowa and North Carolina.

After taking the known risk factors of age and family history into account, Alavanja and his colleagues found an association between prostate cancer and occupational exposure to five insecticides. Those chemicals include DDT and two related compounds that are no longer applied in the United States, as well as permethrin and carbofuran. Prostate cancer risk also appears to be elevated among the workers with exposure to high doses of methyl bromide, which is used to fumigate soil and stored grains, the researchers report in the May American Journal of Epidemiology.

The researchers linked five additional chemicals to increased risk of prostate cancer only among volunteers who had a family history of prostate cancer. These included four related insecticides—chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, fonofos, and phorate—that may increase prostate cancer risk through a common biological pathway, Alavanja says. Permethrin exposure increased cancer risk even more among the men with a family history of prostate cancer than it did in the group as a whole.

The new data strengthen the link between farm chemicals and prostate cancer, says Parent. She lauds the study for having more details about volunteers' exposures to chemicals than past studies have had and for taking into account such factors as the use of protective gear. Nevertheless, she says, it's too early to convincingly pin blame for prostate cancers on specific chemicals or to exonerate other chemicals.

Alavanja says his team next plans to analyze data on volunteers who've developed cancer since 1999.

********

References and Sources for this Article

References:

Alavanja, M.C.R., et al. 2003. Use of agricultural pesticides and prostate cancer risk in the agricultural health study cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology 157(May 1):800-814. Abstract available at aje.oupjournals.org.

Further Readings:

Raloff J. 1999. Pesticides and breast cancer. Science News 155(Jan. 23):56. References and sources available at sciencenews.org

Sources:

Michael C.R. Alavanja
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
National Cancer Institute
EPS
Rockville, MD 20892

Marie-Élise Parent
University of Quebec
INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier
531 Boulevard des Prairies
Laval, QC H7V 1B7
Canada

From Science News, Volume 163, No. 19, May 10, 2003, p. 291.


phschool.com