Read this Bush "mushroom cloud" speech and tell me it's not dishonest and manipulative as hell. The message was clear. If we didn't invade Iraq RIGHT NOW we'd be in danger of 9-11 the sequel. Or worse. Because Saddam and Al Qaida are basically the same thing and are using Iraq as their WMD's base. Just a big fat lie.
GW Bush, 2002 before invasion
"First, some ask why Iraq is different from other countries or regimes that also have terrible weapons. While there are many dangers in the world, the threat from Iraq stands alone -- because it gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place. (*BS)
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are controlled by a murderous tyrant, who has already used chemical weapons to kill thousands of people. (*When Reagan had no problem with it) This same tyrant has tried to dominate the Middle East (*So have we), has invaded and brutally occupied a small neighbor, has struck other nations without warning (*Makes it sound like two different attacks), and holds an unrelenting hostility towards the United States. (*Actually Saddam was our ally before '91)
By its past and present actions, by its technological capabilities (*We'd already bombed them into oblivion), by the merciless nature of its regime, Iraq is unique. (WHy? It has oilfields that are easy to take to I can steal the mid-terms?)
As a former chief weapons inspector for the U.N. has said, "The fundamental problem with Iraq remains the nature of the regime itself: Saddam Hussein is a homicidal dictator who is addicted to weapons of mass destruction." (* Then how come he doesn't have any?)
Some ask how urgent this danger is to America and the world. The danger is already significant, and it only grows worse with time. (*How mkuch time? 5-10 years or 5-10 months?) If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today -- and we do -- (*There's a fat lie) does it make any sense for the world (* Bush speaks for the world after snubbing the UN?) to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?
In 1995, after several years of deceit by the Iraqi regime, the head of Iraq's military industries defected. It was then that the regime was forced to admit that it had produced more than 30,000 liters of anthrax and other deadly biological agents. (* Let's see the intelligence, GW, that was 8 years ago after many bombing runs) The inspectors, however, concluded that Iraq had likely produced two to four times that amount. (* When? Who did? Inspectors were in Iraq anf found no evidence of this) This is a massive stockpile of biological weapons that has never been accounted for, and is capable of killing millions.
We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, and VX nerve gas. (* When? Back in the 80's under Reagan?) Saddam Hussein also has experience in using chemical weapons. He has ordered chemical attacks on Iran, and on more than forty villages in his own country. (* That was 20 years ago) These actions killed or injured at least 20,000 people, more than six times the number of people who died in the attacks of September 11. (*Inference, Saddam is worse than Al Qaida and would use those weapons on us)
And surveillance photos reveal that the regime is rebuilding facilities that it has used to produce chemical and biological weapons. (*BS. And if we can see something from the air, why not just bomb it into oblivion?)
Every chemical and biological weapon that Iraq has or makes is a direct violation of the truce that ended the Persian Gulf War in 1991. (* Only we never found any)
Yet Saddam Hussein has chosen to build and keep these weapons, despite international sanctions, U.N. demands, and isolation from the civilized world. Iraq possesses ballistic missiles with a likely range of hundreds of miles -- far enough to strike Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey, and other nations -- in a region where more than 135,000 American civilians and service members live and work. (* Saddam has never attacked US forces except a few pot-shots when we were driving him out of Kuwait)
We've also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical and biological weapons across broad areas. (* Ha ha, thiose balsa wood hobbyist model planes, some threat) We are concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using UAVs for missions targeting the United States.
And, of course, sophisticated delivery systems are not required for a chemical or biological attack -- all that might be required are a small container and one terrorist or Iraqi intelligence operative to deliver it. (* Again, more outrageous manipulation and scare tactics)
And that is the source of our urgent concern about Saddam Hussein's links to international terrorist groups.
Over the years, Iraq has provided safe haven to terrorists such as Abu Nidal (*Who was retired, an old man by then), whose terror organization carried out more than ninety terrorist attacks in twenty countries that killed or injured nearly 900 people, including 12 Americans. (*Talk about a stretch, that's just BS)
Iraq has also provided safe haven to Abu Abbas, (*Another retired old terrorist from the 70's) who was responsible for seizing the Achille Lauro and killing an American passenger. And we know that Iraq is continuing to finance terror, and gives assistance to groups that use terrorism to undermine Middle East peace.
We know that Iraq and the al Qaeda terrorist network share a common enemy -- the United States of America. We know that Iraq and al Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a decade. Some al Qaeda leaders who fled Afghanistan went to Iraq. (*He's talking about Zarqazwi who Cheney said had his leg amputated in Baghdad, then mysteriously grew his leg back after the invasion)
These include one very senior al Qaeda leader who received medical treatment in Baghdad this year, and who has been associated with planning for chemical and biological attacks. We have learned that Iraq has trained al Qaeda members in bomb making, poisons, and deadly gases. (* All BS, because the inference is Al Qaida is using Iraq as their WMD's lab)
And we know that after September 11, Saddam Hussein's regime gleefully celebrated the terrorist attacks on America. (* Did he? I never heard that) Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists. (*Bush had no proof for this but said it anyway)
Alliances with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints. (* As if Saddam was intent upon destroying America)
Some have argued that confronting the threat from Iraq could detract from the war against terror. (* Uh huh, it did) To the contrary, confronting the threat posed by Iraq is crucial to winning the war on terror. (* Oh really? Actually it made terrorism stronger)
When I spoke to the Congress more than a year ago, I said that those who harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves. Saddam Hussein is harboring terrorists (* But nobody in Al Qaida, only anti-Israeli terrorists) and the instruments of terror (* What instruments?), the instruments of mass death and destruction. And he cannot be trusted. The risk is simply too great that he will use them, or provide them to a terror network.
Terror cells, and outlaw regimes building weapons of mass destruction, are different faces of the same evil. (* Nice move to merge the two faces of Osama and Saddam) Our security requires that we confront both. And the United States military is capable of confronting both. (* Not alone we're not)
Many people have asked how close Saddam Hussein is to developing a nuclear weapon. We don't know exactly (* So he admits this), and that is the problem. Before the Gulf War, the best intelligence indicated that Iraq was eight to 10 years away from developing a nuclear weapon; after the war, international inspectors learned that the regime had been much closer. The regime in Iraq would likely have possessed a nuclear weapon no later than 1993. (* Notice the dishonest morphing of an old false assumption and present reality which have nothing to do with each other)
The inspectors discovered that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a workable nuclear weapon, and was pursuing several different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. (None of this is true)
Before being barred from Iraq in 1998, the International Atomic Energy Agency dismantled extensive nuclear weapons-related facilities, including three uranium-enrichment sites.
(* In other words, Clinton disarmed Saddam already)
That same year, information from a high-ranking Iraqi nuclear engineer who had defected, revealed that despite his public promises, Saddam Hussein had ordered his nuclear program to continue. The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. (* Cheney's BGS from the corrupt exiles)
Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group he calls his "nuclear mujahedeen" -- his nuclear holy warriors.
Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. (* Then destroy them with bombs)
Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. (* LOL, tubes were not for this purpose)
If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. (* Here's the big lie, that Saddam is an imminent threat)
And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists.
Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? (* Clinton bombed the hell out of Iraq actually)
There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. (* Again, morphing Osama and Saddam)
Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.
(* the ultimate fear-mongering, dishonest as hell.) |
