Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (244828)	8/4/2005 12:30:09 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576297

Well like I said before, having the child inside an incubator is better than killing it, but the bigger question is why the parents want to run away from their responsibilities in the first place. Really? So your main reason for objecting to abortion is that you think the parent's should take responsibility for the results of their careless lovemaking, and a secondary reason is the life of the unborn child? I did not know you would put them in that order. I always thought the anti-abortion group's main driver was that its wrong to kill life, and a fetus is a life. If the bigger question is that parents shouldn't run away from their responsibilities, surely you object to the idea of giving up their children for adoption. Would you outlaw that as well?? Maybe you want to rethink which is the bigger question, or maybe I'm reading to much into your writing.