SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gamesmistress who wrote (129791)8/4/2005 2:28:18 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843
 
I thought adoption records were sealed?? But, if it is true someone, somewhere, somehow, has got to put a stop to the NY TIMES. This is so atrocious it is ASTROUNDING. jdn



To: gamesmistress who wrote (129791)8/4/2005 2:35:27 PM
From: MrLucky  Respond to of 793843
 
Gee, there must be a Pulitzer Prize for the NYT in this adoption story - somewhere.



To: gamesmistress who wrote (129791)8/4/2005 4:53:52 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843
 
TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts

Absolutely despicable. The NYT had better get a denial out on this fast.

I am sure they have checked the SS status of their help by now.



To: gamesmistress who wrote (129791)8/4/2005 5:13:19 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793843
 
Saw that Gina...and words couldn't describe the repugnance I felt for the NYT if this is true.

And we wonder why we can't get good public officials.