Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (37869)	8/5/2005 12:23:19 PM
From: Crimson Ghost	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

Low Bond Rates Mean Ever Higher Funds Rate Comstock Partners, Inc. Low Bond Rates Mean Ever Higher Funds Rate August 04, 2005 An important, but largely overlooked article by Grep Ip in yesterday's Wall Street Journal clearly signals the Fed's intentions to keep raising the fed funds rate until the long-rate increases sharply as well. In our view this can have only negative consequences for both the stock market and the economy. Since Ip is known to be a conduit through whom the Fed communicates with the public and he states at the beginning of the article that “officials there increasingly believe…”. It is obvious from the tone that the reporter was given an off-the-record interview with one or more Fed officials, most likely including Greenspan himself. This would be in keeping with prior periods when it was well known that the Fed used the Journal, the New York Times and John Berry, formerly of the Washington Post, to disseminate views that they did not want to state for attribution. The article states that the bond market in keeping long rates low was diluting Fed “efforts to tighten credit and contain inflation. The result: The longer the bond market keeps long-term rates unusually low, the further the Fed is likely to raise the short term rates…” According to former Fed governor Laurence Meyer, low bond yields “are telling the Fed its job isn't done and they have to keep going.” It is clear from prior statements, however, that it not economic overheating and inflation that the Fed is worried about—it is housing prices. Over the past few months words and actions by the Fed and other financial institutions strongly indicate they are more worried than they say about the bubbling housing market, and the low yield on the long-term bond is a primary culprit. In mid-May the Fed and a number of other agencies, in a try at moral suasion, issued new guidance to mortgage lenders in an attempt to dampen a number of speculative practices that were contributing to the bubble. In addition Greenspan's congressional testimony and speeches by other Fed governors have devoted an increasing portion of space to the “froth” in local markets. They obviously must be aware that these “local” markets include the Northeast seaboard, Florida, and California as well as many other points inland as our emails will attest. These areas comprise a huge portion of the U.S. population and total national home values. It is also these same areas that have provided the mortgage refinancing cash-outs amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars that have helped keep consumer spending afloat and the savings rate close to zero. In Greenspan's congressional testimony on July 21 he directly attributed the boom in home prices and associated risks to the unusual drop in long-rates in the face of an increase in the fed funds rate. In our view the Fed is walking a fine line. They recognize that they must do something about the bubbling housing market, yet run the risk of going too far and throwing the economy into recession and the stock market into a deep downtrend. Since the start of the Fed in 1913 they have instituted a policy of monetary restraint 15 times prior to this one, and in the vast majority of cases, stocks have declined significantly and the economy has gone into recession. With the current economic expansion so unbalanced, growth so dependent on housing, and consumer debt at record levels, the chances of the economy getting out of this mess unscathed look exceedingly small—and this is without even considering the high level of oil prices and the record trade imbalance.

To: mishedlo who wrote (37869)	8/5/2005 1:04:06 PM
From: russwinter	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 110194

Has to be a big global slowdown underway, and a flight to safety trade being set up: kitco.com The BDI chart seems to be predicting a significant slowdown in global economic activity which, for the world’s stock markets, would mean the end of the cyclical bull market and a return of the secular bear market, and probably with a vengeance. For the world’s capital markets, the dropping BDI should, in theory, mean lower interest rates. But in the debt-ridden US, a declining economy will cause an unprecedented real estate implosion for starters, which logically would cause interest rates to rise as defaults soared and the mood of Americans changed from fearless to fearful. For the world’s gold devotees, fear has been the missing ingredient, which has kept the precious metal in the doldrums while real estate has been in the limelight. If fear gets a grip on world markets, gold will suddenly become the preferred chaos hedge.

To: mishedlo who wrote (37869)	8/5/2005 1:18:11 PM
From: Umunhum	Respond to of 110194

Adding here is asking for it IMO but as I said, I hope yields go higher. I added another 5 to bring the position to 30. A close over 44.20 will prompt me to add another 10 and I think I'll stop there. I don't know what you're looking at but I see a chart that is breaking out: stockcharts.com[w,a]daolyyay[dd][pb50!b200][vc60][iUb14!La12,26,9]&pref=G Then factor in the fundamentals of what's behind this move and you got a no brainer IMO. If the US is borrowing 70-80% of the world's savings and is on a trajectory to borrow 100% interest rates have to rise.