SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (37928)8/5/2005 5:36:12 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Respond to of 110194
 
The Sean Hewitt Testimony of How Powerful People Have Been Making Fortunes in Crude Oil Trading

By Hassan El-Najjar

August5 ,2005



Since the death of King Fahd of Saudi Arabia, on August1 ,2005 , crude oil prices stayed over $61. 5per barrel in the US New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). This all time high oil price is politically illogical as the death of King Fahd will not lead to any instability in the political system of the largest world oil-producing country. The real explanation does not lie in politics. Rather, it is in understanding how trading in the NYSE works, as Sean Hewitt argued. Stock market Insiders may have already started selling their crude oil contracts, or may be still pushing for a higher price before doing so, as Hewitt would argue. When they sell their big contracts, prices of crude oil start to decrease and a new cycle of trading begins when prices reach their lowest level.

Sean Hewitt has been a crude oil trader in the NYSE for decades. He wrote a small book about his experience and sent me a copy. The following is a summary of his experience, as he wrote it,* of how powerful people have been fortunes in crude oil trading. To protect himself from the powerful people in the know, Sean wrote that all names and events were fictional though conforming to what has been happening in the stock market.

As an example of what happens in a single trade period, Sean Hewitt explains that directly after September11 ,2001 , crude oil prices declined in the US New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The oil prices were "supported and set on a course of a long uptrend lasting 14 months from $17/barrel to all the way up to over $ 40/barrel just prior to the war in Iraq. Since the people in the know effectively started the move almost 14 months before the war, it is now obvious to me that the people in the know had made up their minds about the Iraq war back in the fall of2001 ."

"When the Iraq war became a reality, the people in the know smashed the price within days as they took profits when the buying interest was the highest."

Basically, Sean Hewitt is arguing that big political decisions, like the US-UK invasion of Iraq in 2003, are market oriented, thus confirming what Paul O'Nel and Clark said. It was decided well before September11 , 2001 attacks. What's new here is that Sean Hewitt is telling us that the Iraq war was decided in relation to crude oil prices in the stock market.

Between September11 , 2001 and October2004 , a US crude oil trader started a trading account worth of $ 100million. In just five trades, during this three-year period, he was able to increase the account into $3. 65billion. His 10% commission was $ 365million and the rest went to the account owner.

The major argument Sean Hewitt is making is that while most people are occupied with watching the political decisions of the US government, including waging wars, they are missing the economic or financial purposes of these decisions. In his view, wars or homeland security measures are designed to influence prices of stocks, particularly crude oil prices in this case. In brief, powerful people (stock market insiders) influence plans and decisions of launching wars, which enables them to make billions of dollars in profits, within a very short time of their life.

The following is a summary of the five trades that Sean Hewitt described had happened in about three years and made the above-mentioned fortune.

The Five Oil Trades:

The first trade was buying $ 100million worth of crude oil contracts in January and February 2002 (benefiting from oil price decline after September11 , 2001 attacks), when the price was $18/barrel and $22/barrel. On February2003 , he sold his oil contracts when the price reached $38/barrel, making $ 148million in profits, in a twelve-month trading period.

The second trade was buying $ 248million worth of crude oil contracts in March2003 , when the price was $28/barrel, as a result of selling the big contracts by the insiders. Within one week, just before the US-UK war on Iraq, he sold his oil contracts when the price reached $38/barrel again, making $ 225million in profits.

The third trade was buying $ 473million worth of crude oil contracts in June2003 , when the price was about $33/barrel. In July2003 , the contracts were automatically sold with a loss of $1. 75per barrel, which he set in advance as a precaution. This led to a loss of $16. 5million.

The fourth trade was buying $ 456million worth of crude oil contracts in April2004 , when the price was $34/barrel. In October2004 , the contracts were automatically sold at a price of $58.50/barrel. This sale made him about $1. 124billion in profits. (Sean Hewitt here explains the $60+/barrel by the October surprise).

The fifth trade was buying $1. 58billion worth of crude oil contracts again in October2004 , when the price crashed to $28/barrel. His contracts were sold in the same week for $58/barrel, making $2. 25billion in profits. Thus, the Saudi account grew to $3. 65billion, from which he made $365 million as his10 % commission.

* Hewitt, Sean.2004 . "Crude Bedfellows: How the insiders set-up, started, and finished a bull market run in crude oil." Author House: Bloomington, Indiana, USA.



To: mishedlo who wrote (37928)8/5/2005 6:54:39 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 110194
 
Since we don't save, without rampant money creation we have nothing to lend. If we stop the printing presses and if foreigners see the real risks in our markets, lending can plummet and rates can rise at the same time.



To: mishedlo who wrote (37928)8/5/2005 7:42:21 PM
From: bond_bubble  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
I think the interest rate goes up for the following reason:

Since 1980s, monetary inflation did not cause the statistical value of CPI to increase much (as assets are not included in CPI - however there was productivity enhancement due to labor usage from india/china which was causing prices to fall i.e we used goods from these countries which formed part of the CPI and kept it low to a great extent). Why would monetary deflation cause this statistical data to fall?
The hedonic adjustments etc are going to rise in reverse gear when the economy falls!!! i.e currently, everyone is going into house and hence rents are falling. The rental equivalent are used for CPI calculation. When the house price falls (i.e during recession), everyone who defaulted will be moving to rentals and the rentals appreciate (another reason being - currently all rental props are being sold as condos hence scarcity of rental properties). Hence the statistical data CPI will increase. This happened in 1982 when LA props fell and rents increased and this showed in CPI!! Obviously, this is the price one pays for hedonic adjustments. While getting addicted, it gives oomph. During withdrawal it "scorches" you dry!! It takes the extremes!!!

In a recession (both inflationary recession as in 1970s) and deflationary recessions (1930s) - there is only ONE thing in common - The higher order goods (like real estate, stocks, mining etc) falls in price MUCH more than lower order goods (like food etc.). In inflationary recession, the food etc increases much more than real estate etc. i.e real estate, raw materials can fall slightly (this happened in 1970s) but the lower order goods increased a lot. Why so? In all recessions - people will say this - before recession it costed me 50,000 lunches to buy a house (higher order good) and during recession, he would say, it only costs me 10,000 lunches to buy a house!! i.e recessions make sure lower order goods are preferred and higher order goods are not.

We can not call oil today as higher order goods. It has become essentially a lower order goods because people live so far away from everything, and everything they do needs oil. I strongly feel, the dollar will be falling (MUCH more than other currencies for variuos reasons) and I think oil price in dollar will maintain a high price. This will not allow the CPI statistical value to fall. CPI constitutes mainly lower order goods and MOST of these goods are currently imported (and hence the CPI is not increasing much today). But during recession, If it has to be substituted by local US economy, it will be inflationary - If not, the USD fall will make it inflationary to import.

Hence interest rates will go up to ease the price pain of lower order goods in a deflationary environment. Money stock will still fall significantly because higher order goods have taken such a huge percentage of today's economy. In 1929, lower order goods had quite a high percentage of GDP compared to higher order goods. Today it is relegated to a low percentage. So even if the lower order goods rise 100%, and higher order goods falls 20%, there will be decline in money stock (monetary deflation)!!!

Can you tell me why a farmer in US is going to produce food at a lower cost during recession? Because the dollar falls (which is a separate topic), the mexican workers will not take lesser salary in dollar terms. THe oil, fertilizer etc are not going to fall in USD (it might fall against yuan, yen etc). Hence food prices are going to remain same or increase!! Only way to increase dollar value is to increase interest rate...So that people - although they loose asset and job - they can atleast bear the inflation....

Mish, Russ - your opinions will be highly appreciated...



To: mishedlo who wrote (37928)8/5/2005 9:58:13 PM
From: Umunhum  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 110194
 
You are not going to loan it out at all. Money supply will implode. Demand for money will drop. The bank will be unwilling to lend to those going under and those in good shape will have no reason to borrow.

I see, so there will be no interest rate what-so-ever because there will be no borrowing or lending. One day you are going to realize how ludicrous your scenario is.

the FED will react by lowering rates just as Japan did.....
With the same predictable results I might add.


Wrong again. If the economy implodes, so does tax revenue. You seem to think that the foreigners are going to continue buying our treasuries (and holding the ones they already own) despite the fact that it is going to be apparent to everyone that the US Government is insolvent. America's manufacturing base has been exported overseas. There is virtually nothing left that we can trade that is going to support the dollar. The US Government would have to start printing like crazy, interest rates would skyrocket and the Dollar would die.

Japan's government didn't have a huge deficit that required foreign funding and it didn't export it's manufacturing base to other countries.

There is only one way out of this mess and that is to devalue the dollar. And to think that interest rates are going to go down while the US Government devalues the dollar is crazy.



To: mishedlo who wrote (37928)8/6/2005 2:19:24 AM
From: bond_bubble  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Mish,
Your assumption is that because of monetary deflation, there is ALSO going to be CPI deflation [i.e monetary inflation did not cause CPI statistical value to go up much - but monetary deflation will make it go low? Even in 1929, asset prices were not part of CPI. I've only heard prices fell sharply - but for higher order goods like car, oil etc. Do you think food prices fell? Govt had price support mechanism for agriculture - And in Murray Rothbard's book - the govt wanted price controls on meat producers because govt thought they were gouging consumers!! - Also, they had rent controls. I dont think food prices and house rental fell in 1929 - CPI in 1929 must have contained some higher order goods also at that time. Today, the hedonics have all changed that]. Why cant we have monetary deflation, where higher order goods (like stock, bonds and real estate, mines, services etc) falling a lot and the lower order goods price rising? Since our GDP is mostly comprised of higher order goods, even if the higher order goods fall 30% and the lower order goods rise by 40%, still you could have monetary deflation of 25% (ie money stock falls). Why cant this happen?

Also, In a deflation, you are predicting - a dollar will purchase more stuff of lower order goods as well (it will buy more higher order goods is guaranteed because of money stock falling) i.e you are saying Dollar will appreciate against all goods? I understand your predicament that it can not appreciate against other fiats - but against lower order goods as well? i.e there is going to be lower CPI (since today's CPI mostly contain lower order goods)?

My brother is working in Japan. And he says food prices are not falling but increasing. You know why? They have import controls for food. Apartment rentals are not cheap. They are more expensive than US. i.e rentals did not fall like 30% when real estate crashed 60%. i.e even in deflation certain things will still be priced higher. i.e Dollar will lose value against those goods (mostly lower order goods). If so, interest rate goes up.

Which part do you disagree with?