Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (22158)	8/6/2005 1:23:51 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

It was not out of the blue. It is a perfectly legitimate question to ask; What's the difference between partial birth abortion and what the Nazis did in eliminating children with congenital defects and people who had mental incapacities? "The discussion about abortion has nothing whatsoever to do with Naziism. All law abiding citizens in Canada and the United States support the law." So far the only difference you have shown is that abortion is legal. Only that's not a difference because what the Nazis did was also legal. So what's the difference? "You are attempting to smear all those who support the legal right to abortion." No I'm simply asking what's the difference. I don't see any. "Murder is illegal and immoral." Actually murder is immoral even when it is legal. That's why the Nazis were put on trial and convicted for crimes against Humanity. Murder is the unjustified killing of an innocent Human being. The child who gets the scissors thrust into it's skull is an innocent Human being that is (in most cases) killed, unjustifiably. That is legalized murder and it is immoral and outrageous. Why do you defend the practice?