Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (245168)	8/7/2005 3:46:44 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1588047

Ted, too much to refute in your post, so I'll be brief: - You are going nuts if you think Bush's push for "intelligent design" is anything to be concerned about. Or Bush saying he believed Palmiero. Or Bush exercising six times a week. You didn't answer my question. - Washington has more than enough "terrorism experts" getting paid six-figure salaries to analyze the enemy. So do the news media for that matter. Everyone pretty much has the terrorists all figured out, so what makes you think you know more? Just because you're a master of hindsight and second-guessing? LOL. How successful has Bush's war on terrorism been? What do you need.......a kick in your butt before you wake up? - Same old argument from you: "I'm not against God, but I'm against organized religion." Then you go ahead and lump guys like Pat Roberton in the same group as Osama bin Laden. That's nuts in itself, but at times you have even lumped me in with Pat Robertson, when the truth is that I'm not very fond of him. It's the same old prejudice I see time and time again from those who don't understand religion but think they have it all figured out. I am lumping OBL in with Robertson because their fundamentalism is similar. Fortunately, Robertson is not as violent as OBL. Bottom line: The only one irrationally overreacting here is you. Good. Again, there is no deductive reasoning; hence, your conclusions are not logical.