SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (22176)8/9/2005 1:00:34 AM
From: Greg or e  Respond to of 28931
 
"I will repeat what I have just said--and which you have not responded to"

I did respond to your points. Stop harassing me!

"Murder is illegal and immoral."

<<<Actually murder is immoral even when it is legal. That's why the Nazis were put on trial and convicted for crimes against Humanity. Murder is the unjustified killing of an innocent Human being. The child who gets the scissors thrust into it's skull is an innocent Human being that is (in most cases) killed, unjustifiably. That is legalized murder and it is immoral and outrageous.

Why do you defend the practice?>>>
Message 21579354

Message 21576612

"I also told you repeatedly that it was unacceptable. But you have not retracted it. If for any reason SI should not deal with your defamation--then I will deal with it personally...through the law."

You have defended and advocated for partial birth abortion. Here is the reaction of one mother who had this procedure done;

<<<""After the fetus' brains were sucked out and it was delivered, the mother "held it in her arms and when she looked at that baby she started crying 'Oh God, forgive me, what have I done!'">>>

She had her own child legally put to death, that's what she did.

The picture that was not permitted to be seen by those who had the power to stop it and refused can be seen here;
The Horror of 'Partial-birth Abortion'
By Michael Fumento
fumento.com

You object to the term murder but refuse to show why (besides saying it is legal) that it should not be considered just that.