SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (130308)8/7/2005 1:21:40 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 793685
 
>>When it comes to politics, the NYT is a running dog for the DNC.

The Clinton administration folk would be bowled over by that comment.


Just because the NYT was not 100% supportive of the Clinton administration, does not mean they are not 100% unsupportive of the Bush administration.

There is no contradiction between the two observations. None whatsoever.

Just yesterday, the Labor Department published a very strong employment report for July, and the NYT, which has spent four years bitching about "a jobless recovery" did its best to spin 200,000 new jobs as bad news. There was never such obvious negative spin in any Clinton era report. Good economic news was reported straight when Clinton was president.



To: JohnM who wrote (130308)8/7/2005 5:26:04 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793685
 
have you been keeping your readers up on just how close Fitzgerald is to some sort of move on Rove.

Your side keeps hoping against hope for Rove to fall. Sorry, not going to happen. If they had him, he would have been gone long ago.

Miller is a villain in this piece. It looks more and more like the media fill the WH in on Plame.