Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Philosophical Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (176)	8/7/2005 11:39:20 PM
From: Rarebird	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26251

>>I've been talking about the same argument, in the same form from the beginning. I am not mixing anything up.>> You won't be intentionally mixing up the Cosmological Argument for the Ontological argument on my thread any longer; for they are, in fact, 2 separate arguments. >>"Since no human is perfect" is true (and I would agree with it) would only mean that you are making an argument about something other than a human. It doesn't automatically refer to God.<< You like to babble and just hear yourself talk nonsense and mumbo jumbo. I liked this argument of yours in particular: "An argument with a similar, and valid, form would be George Bush is president of the United States If George Bush is president of the United States than Tim Fowler has vast political influence. Therefore : Tim Fowler has vast political influence" Message 21576296 The form of that reasoning sounds similar to: If George Bush is President of the United States, then God should have created man with 2 pencils and 1 nut rather than 1 pencil and 2 nuts. Time to go back to your castle, Tim: Subject 53436 You are no longer welcome here.