SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (4580)8/7/2005 9:58:41 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
Former oil-for-food chief quits amid scandal
Sevan calls charges false, says Annan 'sacrificed' him

Sunday, August 7, 2005; Posted: 8:36 p.m. EDT (00:36 GMT)

UNITED NATIONS (CNN) -- The former director of the U.N. oil-for-food program resigned Sunday, denying wrongdoing and blasting the organization a day before he is to be accused of profiting from illegal deals.

Benon Sevan resigned from the United Nations in a letter to Kofi Annan, accusing the secretary-general of "sacrificing" him for political expediency.

A spokesman for the U.N.-appointed Independent Inquiry Committee investigating the program told CNN last week that the committee's latest report on the topic, to be issued Monday, would address allegations against Sevan.

Sevan's lawyer, Eric Lewis, said Thursday that he had been provided the findings in advance, and -- in a written statement -- vehemently denied any wrongdoing by his client. (Full story)

In the career diplomat's three-page letter to Annan, released by Lewis' office, Sevan called his management of the program "transparent."

He said he was proud of what he and his staff accomplished and dismayed at the lack of support from the United Nations. Sevan, 67, noted that he has worked with Annan for nearly 40 years on various projects.

"I am disappointed by the tepid manner in which the United Nations has spoken out in defending the program against the scandalous accusations," Sevan said.

"As I predicted, a high-profile legislative body invested with absolute power would feel compelled to target someone, and that someone has turned out to be me," he said. "The charges are false, and you, who have known me all these years, should know that they are false.

"I fully understand the pressure that you are under, and that there are those who are trying to destroy your reputation as well as my own, but sacrificing me for political expediency will never appease our critics or help you or the organization."

Lewis said the inquiry committee -- led by former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker -- will contend that Sevan took $160,000 from the trading company American Middle Eastern Petroleum, known as AMEP, to help it secure lucrative oil contracts from the regime of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

The committee accuses Sevan of acting "in concert" with Eric Nadler, a friend related to AMEP's owner, Fakhry Abdelnour.

Volcker's panel will cite as evidence telephone contacts with Nadler that occurred during "significant periods," such as "just before and after" oil allocations and contract negotiations, Lewis said.

AMEP has admitted to the panel's investigators that it paid an illegal surcharge of $160,000 in October 2001 to guarantee oil contracts from Iraq.

According to U.N. financial disclosure forms, Sevan received $160,000 in four cash payments from 1999 to 2003. He described them on financial disclosure forms as cash gifts from an aunt, a retired government photographer who lives in Cyprus.

"According to a long-time family friend, she never had shown signs of having access to large amounts of cash," the panel's February report stated.

That report said Iraq provided the oil to Sevan in an effort to gain his support on several issues, including the repair and rebuilding of Iraq's infrastructure.

Volcker accused Sevan of placing himself in a "continuing conflict-of-interest situation that violated explicit U.N. rules and violated the standards of integrity essential to a high-level, international civil servant."

However, Sevan wrote Sunday: "I managed a $64 billion program, and the (committee) thinks I would compromise my career for $160,000 and then report it publicly. This is what happens when you appoint an unaccountable 'special prosecutor' with an unlimited budget and mission to find someone, anyone to blame."

According to Sevan, the United Nations transferred nearly $10 billion to the Development Fund for Iraq after the oil-for-food program ended, in November 2003.

Under the program, Iraq was permitted to export a limited amount of its crude oil to buy food, medicine and supplies.

The program, the largest humanitarian operation in U.N. history, was designed to help Iraq deal with the international economic sanctions imposed after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

It generated $64 billion in revenue from its launch in late 1996 until the U.S.-led invasion toppled Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Over seven years, 248 companies incorporated in 61 countries bought 3.4 billion barrels of Iraqi crude oil, with the proceeds deposited in a U.N.-controlled bank account that paid vendors who sold U.N.-approved goods back to Iraq. The oil revenue also paid for weapons inspectors.

Since the program ended, Sevan has worked at the United Nations as an "adviser," receiving $1 per year so he would be available to talk with Volcker's committee.

Multiple investigations were prompted by reports that Saddam extorted billions of dollars in surcharges from chosen oil buyers, received kickbacks from suppliers of goods and may have awarded rights to buy oil as political favors to countries that supported rolling back sanctions.



To: steve harris who wrote (4580)8/7/2005 11:49:42 PM
From: 10K a day  Respond to of 9838
 
it's in the green room



To: steve harris who wrote (4580)8/9/2005 11:41:12 AM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
Four in 9/11 Plot Are Called Tied to Qaeda in '00
By DOUGLAS JEHL
Published: August 9, 2005

WASHINGTON, Aug. 8 - More than a year before the Sept. 11 attacks, a small, highly classified military intelligence unit identified Mohammed Atta and three other future hijackers as likely members of a cell of Al Qaeda operating in the United States, according to a former defense intelligence official and a Republican member of Congress.

Forum: National Security
In the summer of 2000, the military team, known as Able Danger, prepared a chart that included visa photographs of the four men and recommended to the military's Special Operations Command that the information be shared with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the congressman, Representative Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania, and the former intelligence official said Monday.

The recommendation was rejected and the information was not shared, they said, apparently at least in part because Mr. Atta, and the others were in the United States on valid entry visas. Under American law, United States citizens and green-card holders may not be singled out in intelligence-collection operations by the military or intelligence agencies. That protection does not extend to visa holders, but Mr. Weldon and the former intelligence official said it might have reinforced a sense of discomfort common before Sept. 11 about sharing intelligence information with a law enforcement agency.

A former spokesman for the Sept. 11 commission, Al Felzenberg, confirmed that members of its staff, including Philip Zelikow, the executive director, were told about the program on an overseas trip in October 2003 that included stops in Afghanistan and Pakistan. But Mr. Felzenberg said the briefers did not mention Mr. Atta's name.

The report produced by the commission last year does not mention the episode.

Mr. Weldon first spoke publicly about the episode in June, in a little-noticed speech on the House floor and in an interview with The Times-Herald in Norristown, Pa. The matter resurfaced on Monday in a report by GSN: Government Security News, which is published every two weeks and covers domestic-security issues. The GSN report was based on accounts provided by Mr. Weldon and the same former intelligence official, who was interviewed on Monday by The New York Times in Mr. Weldon's office.

In a telephone interview from his home in Pennsylvania, Mr. Weldon said he was basing his assertions on similar ones by at least three other former intelligence officers with direct knowledge of the project, and said that some had first called the episode to his attention shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The account is the first assertion that Mr. Atta, an Egyptian who became the lead hijacker in the plot, was identified by any American government agency as a potential threat before the Sept. 11 attacks. Among the 19 hijackers, only Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi had been identified as potential threats by the Central Intelligence Agency before the summer of 2000, and information about them was not provided to the F.B.I. until the spring of 2001.

Mr. Weldon has long been a champion of the kind of data-mining analysis that was the basis for the work of the Able Danger team.

The former intelligence official spoke on the condition of anonymity, saying he did not want to jeopardize political support and the possible financing for future data-mining operations by speaking publicly. He said the team had been established by the Special Operations Command in 1999, under a classified directive issued by Gen. Hugh Shelton, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to assemble information about Al Qaeda networks around the world.

"Ultimately, Able Danger was going to give decision makers options for taking out Al Qaeda targets," the former defense intelligence official said.

He said that he delivered the chart in summer 2000 to the Special Operations Command headquarters in Tampa, Fla., and said that it had been based on information from unclassified sources and government records, including those of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

nytimes.com.

Another interesing piece of the 9/11 story. Now we know for sure that the U.S. Government knew about Atta and his cohorts. They must have been tracking them. We also now know how they released their names and pictures so quickly after 9/11/01.