Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (130591)	8/8/2005 9:03:52 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793707

Right wing hooha No, that's media hooha. On file with the court by the papers involved, including the NYT. administration "fixing" the intelligence, not finding wmds, and then trying to "fix" the critique. I can just imagine their frenetic activities around that time. You are so wrapped up in your conspiracy theories that you can hear nothing else. If the Admin gets cleared, it won't be because they were clear, it will be because of the coverup. I understand. This has been a tough five years for you. With three more coming followed by another Republican President. You are facing a bitter old age. :>)

To: JohnM who wrote (130591)	8/8/2005 12:29:48 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793707

The CIA filed a complaint with the Justice Department. That's all we need to know. Now, John, I realize that you and Bill were in a bit of heated exchange regarding la femme Plame but it doesn't justify writing such drivel. I mean, really, your pen suggesting that the CIA is a pristine and aggrieved organization? And that is all we need to know about it? Please, none of us have fallen off the tomato truck recently.

To: JohnM who wrote (130591)	8/8/2005 2:52:19 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793707

The Senate committee report was written by the majority staff, i.e., the Republicans, under the very strict tutelage of Roberts. And dumbly signed on by Rockefeller. About whom little favorable should be said at this point VS. I had forgotten, again, that you considered all critical comments vis a vis the Bushies as "left wing attacks" so you could dismiss them. My bad. When we get to the point that CIA criticisms of the Bushies are written as "left wing attacks", we've moved into a zone that has something beyond little meaning I have a hard time reconciling these statements, John. Shouldn't surprise anyone, of course. Anything you disagree with is partisan and beneath consideration. Contra anything you agree with. Derek