Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aladin who wrote (130716)	8/8/2005 7:52:12 PM
From: JohnM	Respond to of 793725

This is all very interesting and may well be true. I haven't seen any serious research that demonstrates; just political PR. So who knows? You need research to see the cabinet is diverse? Are you blind? Nope. The point, John, and a hello to you, was that someone back on this thread copied a text that claimed it's the most diverse, not that it is diverse. I will concede the point that Democrats have done better with minorities. Its just surprising that you will argue about the number of minorities in Bush's administration. That's the point, that Dems have "done better with minorities." I'm not arguing about the number of minorities in the Bush administration. I'm simply asserting that their own claims to have the most diverse administration in history need to be substantiated by some other source. Not hard to understand.