Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ThirdEye who wrote (32519)	8/9/2005 6:56:21 PM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361123

That's why he's here. I want him to face the facts, not by insulting him but by asking him his reasons for not being totally against this president.

To: ThirdEye who wrote (32519)	8/9/2005 6:59:01 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361123

I have now posted thousands of times on SI. To my recollection, I have not once defended this president. I have criticised him and I have probably recognised some good qualities but I don't recall defending him. There is a huge difference between asking you to validate your claims against him or the administration vs defending him. Black and white thinkers do not tend to get that. I am not saying you are a black and white thinker since I don't know what you think about. I chastise my own children when they accuse another child of wrong doing without cause or substance. The accused may well be an awful person for all I know, my concern is that my children protect their honor.