Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hoa Hao who wrote (131044)	8/9/2005 8:47:41 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793731

Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather not hunt if I was doing it like that. It doesn't seem to be "hunting" to me, but target shooting with live targets. Not very "sporting".

To: Hoa Hao who wrote (131044)	8/10/2005 1:37:16 AM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793731

Hoa Hao, If the pheasants are raised by private sources on farms, like catfish, why shoot them in the first place? If you really like to eat them, just buy one, dress it, and eat it. Why use them for target shooting? Does it make you feel more like a man? I hunted pheasants one time in Kansas, and almost any idiot can shoot one down with the pattern of a shotgun. There is, absolutely, no reason for anyone to hunt an animal unless his family is hungry, and has no other protein food source. The argument of preventing over crowding of an animal specie is a farce. Nature took care of that a long time before man came along, and doesn't need man to use that excuse.