Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (131339)	8/10/2005 3:52:38 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793639

"I do believe a person can have a strong desire to "sleep" with another person, child or animal." You are not talking about family here cuddling, just a weird deviant. This discussion is making me sick. Child abuse is a serious subject with me. I am going to have to put you on ignore. You are a very troubled man.

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (131339)	8/10/2005 5:11:46 PM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793639

Thomas, Yes, Mrs. Grifter was a lousy witness, and should not have been put on the stand. After all, she did allow her Son to be alone, and in bed, with Jackson, but the very fact that Jackson would shell out a million dollars to keep her quiet, is a sure indication of guilt on his part. That celebrities get off the hook just because of who they are, and what they have, should be a crime in itself. OJ was guilty, Michael was guilty, and Blake was guilty, but because they were hot stuff, they got off with less than a slap on the wrist. Peterson was guilty, and should have gotten the death penalty, but if he had been like Jackson, he probably would have walked.