Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (131377)	8/10/2005 4:52:28 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793731

They did a shoddy job, so the government pays them more to correct their shoddy work? It sounds like you're talking about the type of contract where the contract doesn't specify a certain result, but only "best efforts." No obligation to succeed, just to try. "Shoddy" isn't appropriate, ever, but I don't suppose the private contractor actually admits that they did shoddy work, pay them anyway. In cases where the government is asking the contractor to do something that's never been done before, what is the best way to allocate risk? In private industry, it's ok to cut someone else's throat, although in practice it's rarely done because it's likely that there will be a continuing relationship. In certain industries (defense industry is one), the government is the only customer, or by far the biggest customer, so cutting throats isn't useful in the long run. Contracts, once awarded, may be modified if it's in the best interest of the government, and that is too complex to give a hard and fast rule about.