Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tsigprofit who wrote (18743)	8/10/2005 9:34:00 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

"I don't give a hoot what Clinton did with Monica" I think that dismissed US General, health, nanny or whatever, was smart. I definitely gave her a hoot, but she disappeared. Sound recordings converted to CD An Extreme Quality™ service For the uncompromising audiophile The King gives a Hoot, maybe no Nanny?? t2dvd.com avconvert.com Not to forget Ayn Rand and Leo Strauss (what did Greenspan really do, when he wasn't 70+??) Tennessee and Gore, Lewinski and Newt, is that mutually gerrymandered much funnier??

To: tsigprofit who wrote (18743)	8/11/2005 10:39:56 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

Nope....factually incorrect. Clinton was a party to a lawsuit by another citizen. The questions he was asked were specifically authorized by an act of Congress in regard to sexual harassment suits and as a matter of fact that very law was signed into existence by Clinton himself. No man is above the law. This is abasic tenet of the American system. Clinton tried to put himself above the law. The reason why is simply irrelevant. Whether Bush had a mistress or not...he never lied under oath about. And you are correct, I don't think we will ever agree on Clinton's "great works"...of which I believe there were very few he can actually take credit for. J.