SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hoa Hao who wrote (131517)8/10/2005 10:32:41 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793759
 
It is obvious that It is obvious that mandatory disqualification of Catholic judges from abortion cases would have only the most minor effect on their professional lives

If we are going to do that, I want to add another few more provisions.

1) mandatory disqualification of black judges from civil rights cases

2) mandatory disqualification of female judges from gender cases

3) mandatory disqualification of chicano judges from immigration cases

4) mandatory disqualification of ..................etc



To: Hoa Hao who wrote (131517)8/10/2005 11:05:45 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793759
 
Didn't we have this dialog in 1960? As I recall democrats were on the side of Catholics at that time.

It's time to have this dialogue.



To: Hoa Hao who wrote (131517)8/11/2005 11:56:02 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793759
 
Stopping a judicial conflict of interest

By Christopher D. Morris | August 9, 2005

Excellent piece. Thanks for posting it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News