SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Vosilla who wrote (37530)8/11/2005 12:24:27 AM
From: CalculatedRiskRespond to of 306849
 
I agree completely. I just offered the one stat that was close (Residential Investment) ... and it makes sense that there was a boom in the '50s.

In every other measure that I'm aware of, housing is the largest % of GDP ever.



To: John Vosilla who wrote (37530)8/11/2005 12:42:26 AM
From: John VosillaRespond to of 306849
 
I guess it is also a matter of what jobs, services and activities are considered housing related. It would be very interesting to see how that figure that includes everything (even stuff like home furnishings and the pool cleaning service<g>) as a percentage of GDP has changed over time if you included all the components. It's not a stretch to believe most folks who now are realtors, mortgage brokers and title insurance reps would have worked in a factory, steel or garment industry ect 50 years ago...



To: John Vosilla who wrote (37530)8/11/2005 2:16:32 PM
From: GraceZRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
I beliieve the housing industry and related businesses in the 1950's were much less as a percentage of total GDP compared to today.

One of the reasons people (even poor people) have so much more crap inside and outside their houses than they did in the 50s comes from shelter shrinking in relation to national income.