Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (38881)	8/12/2005 2:22:51 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 90947

In fairness, fishstick is unbanned. He is free to open fire on you or I on this thread. It appears that his complaint is about me posting a link to his comment on another thread. On another thread he contributed a comment which was not responsive to the content of anything I posted but was simply a public statement that my mother is a whore. If I had responded to that comment in any substantial way that has personal honor, I would probably be suspended from SI indefinitely and maybe jailed in three D. You want back up? Let me know. We should take into account the fact that his upbringing was deficient and the phrase "personal honor" has no meaning for him. Redfish figures he has been bashed. I understand Red’s logic; I am quite familiar with how he presents himself on SI. What say you? Were I to post my true opinion of fishstick, I would be terminated. BTW, he was later banned from that thread for his disgusting comments to Rambi. His disgusting comments about one of the more polite posters on SI were the subject of a number of PM's in my inbox this morning. None supported fishstick. Rambi has my sincere condolence as the object of attack of such scum. Please make a public announcement here as to my suspension status or any impending risks in that regard. I notice Dave deleted fishstick's post and you're still here. I think that's the answer as to how Dave saw it.